02.04.2013 Views

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

44 Structure and the Book ofZechariah<br />

1. <strong>The</strong>re is some significance for the intended structure in the<br />

fact that these chapters mention the date of the incidents<br />

related. If this is so, why is the formula not the same in<br />

chs. 26 and 35? A plausible reply might be offered, but it<br />

would have to be a guess.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong>re is significance for the task of relating units to each<br />

other in the fact that chs. 26 and 35 speak of Jeremiah in the<br />

Temple. But there are many references to the 'house of the<br />

LORD' in the book of Jeremiah, including 28.1, cf. 36.5-6.<br />

3. <strong>The</strong> formula in 36.9 can safely be discounted in the<br />

discussion at this point (cf. 4).<br />

4. Jer. 36.9-32 is a later addition to the text. But 36.8 makes a<br />

strange ending for a book—even a first edition.<br />

5. We can safely ignore the parallels between chs. 32 and parts<br />

of the chapters in the clusters under consideration (e.g.<br />

Anathoth, 29.27).<br />

6. Chapters 27 and 28 should be considered as two separate<br />

entities, comparable to 26 and 35, yet they clearly belong<br />

together, and there is evidence of some editorial activity in<br />

28.1.<br />

7. Jer. 27.1 should read 'Zedekiah' (which I should accept, but<br />

it is not completely certain).<br />

8. Chapter 24 is so similar to ch. 1 that it must have been<br />

intended as the first chapter of the clusters, even when they<br />

were put together. It is true that there are similarities<br />

between chs. 1 and 24—both tell of visions; both have 'What<br />

do you see Jeremiah?' (1.11, 13; 24.3); and, we might add,<br />

both mention building up, tearing down, planting and<br />

uprooting (1.10; 24.6 nan, cnn, sot, 0ra). Jer. 1.10 also has<br />

pro and "DR. Nevertheless there is a logical jump here.<br />

9. We may ignore other parallels, such as the promise 'they shall<br />

be my people and I will be their God' in 24.7, 31.33 and<br />

32.38.<br />

However plausible each of these might be, none is secure, and the<br />

whole series adds up to a shaky hypothesis.<br />

Lundbom, then, has made some very interesting suggestions, but<br />

they need to be much more thoroughly investigated. As far as I know<br />

he has not attempted to do this.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!