02.04.2013 Views

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1. Investigating Structure 35<br />

Scholars have noted its awkwardness in v. 3 and BHS suggests transposing<br />

it after mrv TIR. Structural considerations suggest that MT is<br />

right and that the awkwardness is deliberate.<br />

<strong>The</strong> argument for taking vv. 4-6 together seems, on the contrary,<br />

insecure. We note that 'Seek.. .live' is a recurring refrain that appears<br />

in v. 14 as well as in vv. 4 and 6. Moreover, v. 4 has 'seek me' after<br />

the introductory formula (IF) but vv. 6 and 14 have 'Yahweh' in the<br />

third person. This is not a strong argument, but its force is against<br />

rather than in favour of considering vv. 4-6 as a unit. A further,<br />

more serious problem is that 'Bethel' occurs again in v. 6 thus<br />

producing a ragged structure:<br />

a b c d c b a b<br />

Here, it would be very convenient to accept the LXX's reading fro<br />

^Rifer. Not only would it remove the ragged structure but it would<br />

provide a further inclusio with v. 4. <strong>The</strong>re is no very strong reason<br />

for taking this reading and we could not base any far reaching<br />

conclusions on it.<br />

If we accept the MT it would seem more logical to see the whole<br />

passage like this:<br />

vv. 1-3 A lament and its motivation<br />

vv. 4-5 First exhortation to seek Yahweh and live: no profit in Bethel, Gilgal,<br />

Beersheba, Gilgal, Bethel,<br />

vv. 6-? Second exhortation.<br />

Bethel represents also Gilgal and Beersheba, and thereby Israel as a<br />

(compromised) worshipping community,<br />

vv. 14-? Third exhortation. . .<br />

De Waard argues that his arrangement confirms the secondary character<br />

of the 'list' in v. 6 and refers to Wolff's independent conclusion.<br />

1 Wolff reasons that v. 6 as a whole offers an exegesis of vv. 4-<br />

5: its construction is awkward, it is very like 4.6-13, it is restricted to<br />

Bethel and it is connected with vv. 8-9. This differs from de Waard's<br />

view in taking 'Seek Yahweh and live' as an addition, and in removing<br />

v. 7 from its place (to between v. 9 and v. 10, an option rejected by<br />

de Waard).<br />

1. H.W. Wolff, Joel and Amos (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1977), pp. 232-<br />

33, 240-41.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!