02.04.2013 Views

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

<strong>The</strong> two parts of this study hang together. In the first part I showed<br />

that many of the structural studies undertaken in current scholarship<br />

are carried out with insufficient regard for academic rigour. <strong>The</strong><br />

strict criteria advocated by a number of scholars are almost universally<br />

ignored. I suggested that one significant way of minimizing the<br />

subjective element in structural studies would be to examine all occurrences<br />

of repeated words. I showed beyond reasonable doubt that, if I<br />

had taken notice of these criteria, I should not have been able to<br />

present 'Isaiah 67' as a well-structured whole.<br />

I also suggested that the units to be investigated should be decided<br />

without regard to structural considerations, and as far as possible,<br />

conform to the results agreed by mainline biblical scholarship.<br />

Words were to be examined for their distinctiveness and potential<br />

for acting as markers for the literary structure of a text, and this was<br />

done without regard for the particular structure of the unit under<br />

consideration. I showed that many studies today make use of very<br />

common words. 1<br />

I noted the tendency for scholars to choose convenient labels for the<br />

sub-sections of a unit, so that an apparent regularity of structure was<br />

achieved which did not stand up to close scrutiny. 2 1 resolved to avoid<br />

subjective labelling, and to rely on the content of the unit in question<br />

as explicitly stated in its own words.<br />

It was easy to show that the application of these criteria would have<br />

removed much of the subjective element in current studies. It seemed<br />

likely that scholars studying the same text would no longer be able to<br />

produce conflicting results. 3<br />

1. P. 32 and n. 2; pp.45, 48.<br />

2. See, e.g., pp. 43-44, 50, 169-71, 180, 181-82, 190-91, 195-97.<br />

3. Pp. 59-61.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!