02.04.2013 Views

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

284 Structure and the Book ofZechariah<br />

It does not seem possible to link the glory of the trees of Lebanon<br />

(11.2-3) with the 'lordly price' of 11.13. We may also disregard the<br />

'hairy mantle' of 13.4.<br />

To sum up so far: I have not found any obvious linking of sections,<br />

as in the case of the visions in Zechariah 1-6. Nor have I been able to<br />

confirm the structural theories of Lamarche, Lacocque or Otzen. On<br />

the other hand there does seem to be a coherence to the whole section<br />

9.1-13.9, brought out by the presence of significant ideas expressed in<br />

similar terms. It begins to look as if a connection between the humble<br />

king, the shepherd(s) and the pierced one was really intended by the<br />

person(s) responsible for the final form of Zechariah. This does not<br />

mean that the editor of chs. 1-8 was the same as that of chs. 9-14, or<br />

that the latter worked over the former. <strong>The</strong> impression is given of<br />

two separate entities with a considerable amount in common having<br />

been put together.<br />

Contacts with 12.1-13.6<br />

If I have been right in regarding 11.4-13.9 as a whole unit, and in<br />

seeing an intended unity with 9.1-11.3, then we should look for ways<br />

in which this is confirmed or undermined in 12.1-13.6. It appears that<br />

there are further links: rO3 is used twice of Yahweh's judgment in<br />

12.4 ('strike with panic/blindness'); the fire devours Judah's enemies<br />

(12.6, as in 9.4, although the figure is different in detail); 1 there is<br />

considerable stress upon the idea of 'inhabiting' in the descriptions of<br />

blessing and judgment; rro is used of judgment of idols; 12.5 has<br />

'God' with the personal suffix (12.8 does not fit obviously, but perhaps<br />

it recalls Exod. 4.16 and Yahweh's great deliverance through Moses);<br />

i?2J» is an important word used in the context of battle; the um and DID<br />

make a clear connection with 9.9-10; D'to is used each time with<br />

Yahweh as the subject in the context of making his people a particular<br />

type of instrument for punishing their enemies (warrior's sword, proud<br />

battle horse, cup of reeling, heavy stone, blazing pot/flaming torch);<br />

Yahweh will shield (]r) them. I think we must ignore pR and ncnR.<br />

Looking at the later section, we find nrn and iptz) in close proximity<br />

in 10.2 and 13.2-3, referring to 'diviners' (D'oop) and the (presumably<br />

false) prophet. 2<br />

1. I resist the temptation to reinstate 033, 9.5; 12.10.<br />

2. Lamarche connected these two sections, 10.2-3a and 13.2-6 (Zacharie 9-14,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!