130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System 130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

cipg.codemantra.us
from cipg.codemantra.us More from this publisher
02.04.2013 Views

4. Connections Between Sections ofZechariah 1-14 273 Also Mitchell, who 'was prepared to state that the metre of 13.7- 9.. .resembled that of 3.7', the use of which was 'favourable rather than unfavourable to the authorship of Zechariah'.1 She also lists various criteria: 1. Characteristic words and phrases: 2.10-9.9 7.14-9.8: 'none shall march to and fro' identical phrase, found nowhere else in the OT. 2 2. Idiosyncrasy of dwelling on an idea: 6.10, 11, 13 (take. . .take, crown, throne, throne); 8.4-5 (streets. .. streets) 11.17 (his arm, right eye, both repeated) 14.5 (you shall flee. . .you shall flee as you fled. ..) 14.9 (Yahweh one and his name one) Even if some repetitions are excised as glosses, 'enough examples remain to prove the point'. I find this very doubtful, since the examples are uncertain in any case. 3. Mention of the whole then the part: 5.4 (the house. .. his house. .. both timber and stones) 12.11-13 (every family; specified in 12, 13) 4. Metaphors are followed by their meaning 'as in 10.4' 5. Unusual fivefold development of an idea: 6.13 and 9.5-7 6. Similarities of thought: Cleansing: 1.4; 3.4-9; 5.1-11; 13.1, 9 Promise that the nations will return: 2.10-11; 8.7; 10.6-12 Overthrow and conversion of Israel's enemies: 2.4, 12-13; 8.20-23; 9.1- 8; 12.4; 14.16 Hope of messianic ruler: 6.12-13; 9.9-10. 3 She notes scholars who have given support to these arguments to a greater or lesser extent: The force of these similarities is admitted by those who postulate that the second part was the work of a disciple of Zechariah, as well as those scholars, such as C.H.H. Wright, E.B. Pusey, W.H. Lowe, A. van Hoonacker, who have attributed the whole book to Zechariah. In 1. Baldwin, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi, p. 68; Mitchell, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi and Jonah, p. 235. 2. Baldwin, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi, pp. 68-69. 3. Baldwin, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi, p. 69.

274 Structure and the Book ofZechariah recent years the cogency of the arguments in favour of the unity of the book has been acknowledged by W.F. Albright1 (and conservative scholars [E.J. Young, N.H. Ridderbos, R.K. Harrison]). Again, as P.R. Ackroyd comments, 'The very fact that this linking of 9-14 with 1-8 took place argues for some recognition of common ideas or interests'. 2 It seems to me that it is important to affirm the affinities between Zechariah 1-8 and 9-14, and that Mason has shown beyond reasonable doubt that there is a strong continuity of thought. Still, the evidence adduced here does not point to unity of authorship, nor even editorial unity. In his more recent commentary, 3 K.L. Barker summarizes arguments against unity of authorship as based on: (1) differences in style and other compositional features, and (2) historical and chronological references that allegedly require a later date. He quotes with approval (even relish) G.L. Robinson's comment that there is 'no mode of reasoning so treacherous as that from language and style'. 4 In order to demonstrate that one could draw a list to counteract Mitchell's list of differences in vocabulary 5 he offers a 'partial but suggestive list of expression common to both parts of the book': 6 1. 'No one should come or go', 7.14, and 'against marauding forces' (his italics), 9.8. (This seems to suggest a difference in usage.) 2. 'Declares the Lord', fourteen times in 1-8 and also in 10.12; 12.1, 4; 13.2, 7-8. (This surely cannot be taken seriously.) 3. 'The LORD Almighty' 1.6, 12; 2.13; 9.15; 10.3; 12.5. (It is interesting that at least two of the three references in Zechariah 1-8 are in sections that I have thought to be redactional.) 1. Review of Introduction to the Old Testament, by R.H. Pfeiffer, JBL 61, (1942), p. 121. He actually says: 'Whether any or all of these oracles [of Zech. 9- 14] are to be attributed to Zechariah we cannot say; the reviewer sees no reason why most of them cannot be credited to Zechariah himself. 2. PCB, p. 651. 3. Haggai, Zechariah and Malachi, pp. 596-97. 4. ISBE, V, p. 3139. This reference is from the original edition. 5. Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi and Jonah, p. 236. 6. Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi and Jonah, pp. 596-97.

4. Connections Between Sections ofZechariah 1-14 273<br />

Also Mitchell, who 'was prepared to state that the metre of 13.7-<br />

9.. .resembled that of 3.7', the use of which was 'favourable rather<br />

than unfavourable to the authorship of Zechariah'.1 She also lists<br />

various criteria:<br />

1. Characteristic words and phrases:<br />

2.10-9.9<br />

7.14-9.8: 'none shall march to and fro' identical phrase, found nowhere<br />

else in the OT. 2<br />

2. Idiosyncrasy of dwelling on an idea:<br />

6.10, 11, 13 (take. . .take, crown, throne, throne);<br />

8.4-5 (streets. .. streets)<br />

11.17 (his arm, right eye, both repeated)<br />

14.5 (you shall flee. . .you shall flee as you fled. ..)<br />

14.9 (Yahweh one and his name one)<br />

Even if some repetitions are excised as glosses, 'enough examples<br />

remain to prove the point'. I find this very doubtful, since the<br />

examples are uncertain in any case.<br />

3. Mention of the whole then the part:<br />

5.4 (the house. .. his house. .. both timber and stones)<br />

12.11-13 (every family; specified in 12, 13)<br />

4. Metaphors are followed by their meaning 'as in 10.4'<br />

5. Unusual fivefold development of an idea:<br />

6.13 and 9.5-7<br />

6. Similarities of thought:<br />

Cleansing: 1.4; 3.4-9; 5.1-11; 13.1, 9<br />

Promise that the nations will return: 2.10-11; 8.7; 10.6-12<br />

Overthrow and conversion of Israel's enemies: 2.4, 12-13; 8.20-23; 9.1-<br />

8; 12.4; 14.16<br />

Hope of messianic ruler: 6.12-13; 9.9-10. 3<br />

She notes scholars who have given support to these arguments to a<br />

greater or lesser extent:<br />

<strong>The</strong> force of these similarities is admitted by those who postulate that<br />

the second part was the work of a disciple of Zechariah, as well as<br />

those scholars, such as C.H.H. Wright, E.B. Pusey, W.H. Lowe,<br />

A. van Hoonacker, who have attributed the whole book to Zechariah. In<br />

1. Baldwin, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi, p. 68; Mitchell, Haggai, Zechariah,<br />

Malachi and Jonah, p. 235.<br />

2. Baldwin, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi, pp. 68-69.<br />

3. Baldwin, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi, p. 69.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!