02.04.2013 Views

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. Connections Between Sections ofZechariah 1-14 245<br />

judgment, 1.17 envisages a scattering that is due to his blessing:<br />

'Again my cities will be scattered—because of good'. 1 It is not clear<br />

how much we can make of this. It might be that the editor of 1.17 was<br />

aware of 13.7, but we need more evidence than we have so far found.<br />

D^KJVT "ira occurs in 1.17, 2.16 and 3.2. <strong>The</strong> first two instances are<br />

clearly redactional. This might mean that the redactor prepared for the<br />

statement of 3.2, 'Yahweh has chosen Jerusalem', by the repeated 'will<br />

again choose Jerusalem' at the end of the first vision and the next pair<br />

of visions. It could, of course, be the case that he was responsible for<br />

all three instances. <strong>The</strong> word in 9.17, onim, is completely different<br />

and may be ignored.<br />

Summary and Conclusions<br />

Of the distinctive words found in ch. 1 and elsewhere in Zechariah 1-8<br />

the greatest number occur in either ch. 6 or chs. 7-8, but there are<br />

some contacts with chs. 2 and 3. In ch. 2 the repetitions are either<br />

concerned with Jerusalem, or else occur in the oracular section 2.10-<br />

16 (the only exceptions being ntoi) and '13). In the case of ch. 3 we<br />

have four words linking 1.4-6 with 3.7-10, plus nar and Dbtfvra ~im<br />

linking 1.8 and 17 with 3.1-7 and 3.2 respectively. <strong>The</strong> only references<br />

outside these sections in chs. 2-8 are aitf in 4.1 and 5.1, which<br />

is different from other occurrences and may be ignored; n"?tf which<br />

occurs in 4.9, part of the editorial section; and nnnjj, 4.14, which may<br />

also be redactional.<br />

<strong>The</strong> contacts between chs. 1, 6, and 7-8 may be divided as follows:<br />

1. Zech. 1.1-6 + 10 (11? 12? 13? 14? 15?)-17 dealing with<br />

Yahweh's past action expressing his wrath and his future<br />

compassion. This has strong contact with Zechariah 7-8 but<br />

little with Zechariah 6.<br />

2. Zech. 1.7-11 dealing with the description of the visions of<br />

horses of various colours and riders/chariots. <strong>The</strong>se verses<br />

have clear parallels in Zechariah 6 but little verbal contact<br />

with Zechariah 7-8.<br />

1. It is better, I think, to keep the meaning 'be scattered' since: (1) it makes for a<br />

very effective surprise with man at the end of the clause; (2) the meaning (over)flow<br />

is only suggested here and in Prov. 5.16 (BOB, p. 807), where it can equally well<br />

mean 'be scattered'; and (3) the picture is consonant with Zech. 2.8.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!