130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System
130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System 130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System
3. The Structure of Individual Sections of Zechariah 205 11.15-17 The prophet as shepherd: part 2 Yahweh commanded me to act as a worthless shepherd (No account of the prophet's having done so) (v. 16 theological interpretation) Curse against my/the 1 worthless shepherd 13.7-9 Curse against 'my shepherd' ('in used but a different expression from 11.17) (vv. 8-9 theological interpretation with the great promise 'my people. . .my God' as the climax) If I set out the words that might be significant (see the table) it is possible to construct a formal chiastic unit as follows: 7 a therefore/thus the poor of the flock b took. .. staffs. .. Grace. .. Union c I shepherded. .. 8 I destroyed. .. d ( ) 9 c I will not shepherd. .. what is to be destroyed let it be destroyed 10 b took. ..staff. . .Grace 11 a thus the poor of the flock At this stage it makes no difference whether we put 'the poor of the flock' or 'those who trafficked in the sheep'. If this were to be accepted we should see at d the turning point of the subsection. This, in fact, makes good sense: 'But I became impatient with them...' The main difficulty with it is that we have ignored five words that occur before 11.11.#6, namely "7DK, "ifen, JTIJ, TIQ and DJ>. We should also note that 'I shepherded the sheep' occurs at the beginning and end of v. 7, forming an inclusio for this. If we treat the table with more respect we are bound to conclude that v. 10 forms some sort of parallel with v. 7 but adds certain new elements which again occur in v. 14. It is not clear whether v. 11 should be treated with the preceding or succeeding verses. The sense of the passage clarifies this for v. lla continues the thought of v. 10, v. 11 has a closing formula and v. 12 starts with an introductory 1. Rudolph takes the ' of 'in to be yodh compaginis, indicating the construct state, 'as the following '3t» shows'. The reasoning is cogent, but those hearing the prophecy would presumably first assume that those hearing the prophecy would presumably first assume 'in meant 'my shepherd'. The phrase following adds to the enigma of this passage. In 13.7, 'in does mean 'my shepherd'.
206 Structure and the Book ofZechariah formula. This means that we should take vv. 7-11 as a subsection of the narrative, and that the 'poor of the flock' or 'the traffickers in the sheep' are used to form an inclusio for it. 'And they knew... word of Yahweh' is a climax within the section, as we suspected it might be in discussing individual repeated words. The structure may therefore be set out: 11.4 Thus said Yahweh my God Shepherd the sheep of slaughter 11.6 For 1 1 will cause each to fall hand of his neighbour 11.7 And I shepherded the sheep of slaughter ]Ksn "^p 1 ? I took. . .staffs. . .Grace. . .Union And I shepherded the sheep 11.8 I destroyed (TO) three shepherds. .. BUT mutual hostility (DBteVefcU) 11.9 And I said I will not shepherd you. .. IPO. .. "7DR. .. "iftn each... of her neighbour 11.10 I took. .. staff. .. Grace. . .to annul covenant 11.11 it was annulled jKjfn "» p. . .word of Yahweh 11.12-13 Andl said. .. thirty pieces of silver. .. potter 11.14 broke. . .Union. . .to annul brotherhood. .. 11.15 And Yahweh said to me Again take implements of a shepherd, a/my foolish one 11.16 For behold I am raising up a shepherd in the land who... nro... iton... bsK 1. The 'D of v. 6 is puzzling, since it suggests that the first purpose in the prophet's becoming a shepherd is to do with God's judgment. The best way to approach the problem is to recognize that v. 6 is theological interpretation, rather than an integral part of the parable, and to consider the sheep-shepherd picture as a whole on its own first. The situation is then clarified: become a good shepherd... he does (cf. 'Grace' and 'Union'). He starts to give service to the sheep by removing their bad leaders, but then gives up. We are meant to imagine the prophet within the picture first of all, i.e. as a shepherd with sheep. We should not simply try to by-pass this by interpreting the allegory. Verse 6, therefore, can be understood in this sense: act out this situation because it represents that which I am bringing about in the land.
- Page 156 and 157: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 158 and 159: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 160 and 161: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 162 and 163: Chapter 7 Verses Word 1 3 rfrt 2 1
- Page 164 and 165: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 166 and 167: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 168 and 169: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 170 and 171: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 172 and 173: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 174 and 175: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 176 and 177: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 178 and 179: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 180 and 181: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 182 and 183: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 184 and 185: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 186 and 187: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 188 and 189: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 190 and 191: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 192 and 193: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 194 and 195: Chapter 9 Verses 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15
- Page 196 and 197: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 198 and 199: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 200 and 201: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 202 and 203: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 204 and 205: Chapter 11 Verses Word 4 5 6 7 8 *T
- Page 208 and 209: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 210 and 211: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 212 and 213: Chapter 12 13 Verses Word •on nvr
- Page 214 and 215: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 216 and 217: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 218 and 219: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 220 and 221: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 222 and 223: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 224 and 225: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 226 and 227: Verses 1 Word WHOP 2 ta 3 dT) 7 TDK
- Page 228 and 229: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 230 and 231: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 232 and 233: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 234 and 235: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 236 and 237: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 238 and 239: 3. The Structure of Individual Sect
- Page 240 and 241: 4. Connections Between Sections ofZ
- Page 242 and 243: 4. Connections Between Sections ofZ
- Page 244 and 245: 4. Connections Between Sections ofZ
- Page 246 and 247: 4. Connections Between Sections ofZ
- Page 248 and 249: 4. Connections Between Sections ofZ
- Page 250 and 251: 4. Connections Between Sections ofZ
- Page 252 and 253: 4. Connections Between Sections ofZ
- Page 254 and 255: 4. Connections Between Sections ofZ
3. <strong>The</strong> Structure of Individual Sections of Zechariah 205<br />
11.15-17 <strong>The</strong> prophet as shepherd: part 2<br />
Yahweh commanded me to act as a worthless shepherd<br />
(No account of the prophet's having done so)<br />
(v. 16 theological interpretation)<br />
Curse against my/the 1 worthless shepherd<br />
13.7-9 Curse against 'my shepherd'<br />
('in used but a different expression from 11.17)<br />
(vv. 8-9 theological interpretation with the great promise 'my<br />
people. . .my God' as the climax)<br />
If I set out the words that might be significant (see the table) it is<br />
possible to construct a formal chiastic unit as follows:<br />
7 a therefore/thus the poor of the flock<br />
b took. .. staffs. .. Grace. .. Union<br />
c I shepherded. ..<br />
8 I destroyed. ..<br />
d ( )<br />
9 c I will not shepherd. ..<br />
what is to be destroyed let it be destroyed<br />
10 b took. ..staff. . .Grace<br />
11 a thus the poor of the flock<br />
At this stage it makes no difference whether we put 'the poor of the<br />
flock' or 'those who trafficked in the sheep'. If this were to be<br />
accepted we should see at d the turning point of the subsection. This,<br />
in fact, makes good sense: 'But I became impatient with them...' <strong>The</strong><br />
main difficulty with it is that we have ignored five words that occur<br />
before 11.11.#6, namely "7DK, "ifen, JTIJ, TIQ and DJ>. We should also<br />
note that 'I shepherded the sheep' occurs at the beginning and end of<br />
v. 7, forming an inclusio for this.<br />
If we treat the table with more respect we are bound to conclude<br />
that v. 10 forms some sort of parallel with v. 7 but adds certain new<br />
elements which again occur in v. 14. It is not clear whether v. 11<br />
should be treated with the preceding or succeeding verses. <strong>The</strong> sense<br />
of the passage clarifies this for v. lla continues the thought of v. 10,<br />
v. 11 has a closing formula and v. 12 starts with an introductory<br />
1. Rudolph takes the ' of 'in to be yodh compaginis, indicating the construct<br />
state, 'as the following '3t» shows'. <strong>The</strong> reasoning is cogent, but those hearing the<br />
prophecy would presumably first assume that those hearing the prophecy would<br />
presumably first assume 'in meant 'my shepherd'. <strong>The</strong> phrase following adds to the<br />
enigma of this passage. In 13.7, 'in does mean 'my shepherd'.
Change language