130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

198 Structure and the Book ofZechariah
? ?
1
2
11)
3)
4)
12)
5)
10)
6)
12)
7)
8
9
14
v.i-o
9.9-10
011 17
10.1-2
10.3a, 6, 8-10,
12
10.3, 5-12
11.1-3
11.4-16
11.17
12.1-13.1
.z-o —
13.7-9
14.1, 2, 5t , (9a)
rh 14 Tu/ithnut
Q">
Relevant to the present chapter is the correspondence between 10.3-
12 (only when vv. 5 and 11 are added) and both 9.1-8 and 9-10.
Although I do not feel that the pruning of ch. 10, on the basis of
form-critical (Yahweh-speech, and analysis into 'Wort + Auslegung',
principally) and metrical considerations, is likely to produce reliable
results, 1 yet it might be that the work of a different editor would show
different characteristics in all these areas. There is slightly stronger
reason, therefore, for arguing that an editor added 10.5 and 11, in
order deliberately to form links with 9.1-8, 9-10. Willi-Plein would
claim to have shown that this editor is different from the original
writer, which my own investigation leaves*open.
Zechariah 11.4-17 + 13.7-9
Since the brief section 13.7-9 is often related to ch. 11 and even
moved to be continuous with it, 2 it is convenient to treat them both
together. We shall easily see what words are repeated within 13.7-9
itself.
1. Esp. pp. 49-52.
2. So most commentators this century, e.g. Mitchell (Haggai, Zechariah,
Malachi and Jonah, pp. 314-16), Mason (Haggai, Zechariah andMalachi, pp. 110-
11), Rudolph (Haggai, pp. 211-13), and even Chary (Les propetes et le culte,
p. 194); but not Saeb0 ('Die deuterosacharjanische Frage', pp. 276., q.v. for
further details), or Stuhlmueller. R.C. Dentan actually says: 'A/y shepherd in this
oracle has no connection with the shepherd of 11.15-17' (IB, VI, p. 1109)!