02.04.2013 Views

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

130. - Collection Point® | The Total Digital Asset Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. <strong>The</strong> Structure of Individual Sections of Zechariah 171<br />

a + a' ]'JJ only (nx~i is in b' + a')<br />

b + b' IRQ only (p'rptf, rtro and 30' occur only in b')<br />

On the other hand "i* and ]npi> occur in a + b and b 1 + a 1 respectively.<br />

This could mean that in both halves a place name provides a<br />

link over a break (continuity in discontinuity). However, the material<br />

linked in vv. 2-3 is very different from that linked in vv. 5-7. We<br />

should seem to be resorting to rather desperate conjectures.<br />

When we look at the actual content of vv. 1 and 8, it is difficult to<br />

believe that '<strong>The</strong> word of Yahweh is in the land of Hadrach' is meant<br />

to correspond to 'I will encamp at (? = *?) my house...' One would<br />

have expected at least some verbal clue (e.g. ? TTQ3).<br />

6. Lamarche links this section with 14.16-21. <strong>The</strong> possibly significant<br />

verbal links between the sections are as follows:<br />

mvr 9.7; 14.21 (but also 9.13; 10.3, 6; 11.14; 12 (6x); 14.5, 14)<br />

rva 9.8; 14.20, 21 (but also 10.3, 6, 6; 77.73; 12 (7x); 13.1, 6;<br />

14.2. Instances italicized refer to the Temple).<br />

-1*70 9.5; 14.16, 17 (but also 9.9; 11.6; 14.5, 9, 10. Instances<br />

italicized refer to Yahweh as king).<br />

This does not inspire confidence. <strong>The</strong> theme of Yahweh's kingship is,<br />

however, important and only found explicitly in 9.9 and 14.9, 16-17,<br />

suggesting that further research along these lines might be fruitful.<br />

7. <strong>The</strong>re are several distinctive words and phrases which occur elsewhere<br />

(e.g. msin D'o, D'3 n:>n, ntim la^a). <strong>The</strong>se need to be<br />

accounted for. Further, specific nations are mentioned in 10.10-12 (or<br />

11.1) (Egypt, Assyria and Lebanon) as well as in 14.16-21 (Egypt<br />

alone). Why should we not put 10.10-12 parallel to 14.18-19?<br />

Although Lamarche does not seem to have considered this sort of<br />

possibility, his method implies an answer: the relationship of each passage<br />

as a whole to other whole passages matters more than individual<br />

repeating words. Thus it is true, as he says, that there is a progression<br />

towards universalism. In 9.1-8 the focus is on Israel's near neighbours,<br />

with muted promises about salvation outside Israel/ Judah. In<br />

14.16-21, although Egypt is singled out, the focus is primarily upon<br />

'all the nations'.<br />

It should be interesting to see what results my own proposed<br />

method leads to in comparison with those of Lamarche.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!