02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ANCIENT CLIMATES 69<br />

nian to the Eocene, show well-marked annual rings, indicat-<br />

ing seasons like those <strong>of</strong> the present time^ Furthermore, Berry<br />

goes on to say:<br />

Detailed comparisons <strong>of</strong> these Arctic floras with contemporary floras<br />

from lower latitudes . . . show unmistakable evidence for the exist-<br />

ence <strong>of</strong> climatic zones . . . (430:266).<br />

Brooks concludes, on the basis <strong>of</strong> Berry's evidence, that cli-<br />

matic zones existed in the Eocene (52:24). Ralph W. Chancy,<br />

after a study <strong>of</strong> the fossil floras <strong>of</strong> the Tertiary Period (from<br />

the Eocene to the Pliocene), concluded that climatic zones<br />

existed (72:475) during that whole period. <strong>The</strong> distinguished<br />

meteorologist W. J. Humphreys, whose fundamental work,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Physics <strong>of</strong> the Air, remains a classic, remarked in 1920<br />

that there was no good evidence <strong>of</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong> climatic<br />

zones from the beginning <strong>of</strong> the geological record. Finally,<br />

Dr. C. C. Nikifor<strong>of</strong>f, an expert on soils (both contemporary<br />

and fossil soils), has stated that "In all geological times there<br />

were cold and warm, humid and dry climates, and their ex-<br />

tremes presumably did not change much throughout geological<br />

history" (375:191). We will return, below, to the<br />

significance <strong>of</strong> fossil soils, and present other evidence showing<br />

persistence <strong>of</strong> sharply demarcated climatic zones during the<br />

earth's history. But where, at this point, does the evidence<br />

leave us?<br />

On the one hand, the evidence shows that the plants and<br />

animals <strong>of</strong> the past were distributed without regard to the<br />

present direction <strong>of</strong> the climatic zones. I have been unable to<br />

do more than suggest the immensity <strong>of</strong> the body <strong>of</strong> evidence<br />

supporting this conclusion. On the other hand, the attempt<br />

to deny the existence, in the past, <strong>of</strong> sharply demarcated cli-<br />

matic zones like those <strong>of</strong> the present has failed. It may even<br />

be said to have failed sensationally. <strong>The</strong>re is no scrap <strong>of</strong> evi-<br />

dence for it, except the evidence it is supposed to explain,<br />

while, on the other hand, it is in contradiction both with<br />

the fundamentals <strong>of</strong> astronomy and the preponderance <strong>of</strong><br />

geological evidence.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!