02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

66 EARTH'S SHIFTING CRUST<br />

supposed to explain. Could there be a better example <strong>of</strong><br />

reasoning in a circle? Colbert cites evidence that the Devo-<br />

nian animals were spread all over the world, and then remarks<br />

that therefore ". . . it is reasonable to assume . . .<br />

that the Devonian Period was a time <strong>of</strong> widely spread equable<br />

climates, a period <strong>of</strong> uniformity over much <strong>of</strong> the earth's<br />

surface" (375:255). According to him, the same situation held<br />

true through the Paleozoic and Mesozoic, and even much<br />

later periods (375:268). Other paleontologists reasoned in the<br />

same way. Goldring, for example, remarked: "<strong>The</strong> Carbonif-<br />

erous plants had a world-wide distribution, suggesting rather<br />

uniform climatic conditions" (177:362). She drew the same<br />

conclusions from the world-wide distribution <strong>of</strong> Jurassic flora<br />

(177:363). But it is clear that when a theory<br />

has been con-<br />

cocted to explain a given set <strong>of</strong> facts, those facts themselves<br />

cannot be adduced as pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the theory. This is circular<br />

reasoning. A theory must, first, be shown to be inherently<br />

reasonable, and then it must be supported <strong>by</strong> independent<br />

facts.<br />

Is such a theory inherently reasonable? <strong>The</strong> answer is that<br />

it is not. It involves, in the first place, ignoring the astro-<br />

nomical relations <strong>of</strong> the earth. <strong>The</strong> theory requires us to<br />

assume the existence <strong>of</strong> some factor powerful enough to coun-<br />

teract the variation <strong>of</strong> the sun's heat with latitude. As Pro-<br />

fessor Bain, <strong>of</strong> Amherst, has pointed out, in an article to be<br />

discussed further below,<br />

. /'. <strong>The</strong> thermal energy arriving at the earth's surface per day<br />

per square centimeter averages 430 gram calories at the equator but<br />

declines to 292 gram calories at the 4Oth parallel and to 87 gram<br />

calories at the Both parallel . . . (18:16).<br />

What force sufficiently powerful to counteract that fact <strong>of</strong><br />

astronomy can be suggested, and, more important, supported<br />

<strong>by</strong> convincing evidence?<br />

It was thought at first that universal temperate climates<br />

might be accounted for <strong>by</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> the cooling <strong>of</strong> the<br />

earth. Those who proposed this theory (253, 292) argued that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!