02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THEICEAGES 45<br />

years. To a geologist a period <strong>of</strong> 1,000,000 years has come<br />

to mean almost nothing at all. He is actually used to thinking<br />

that events that took place somewhere within the same 20,-<br />

000,000-year period were roughly contemporaneous. As to<br />

the ice ages, the older ones were simply thrown into one <strong>of</strong><br />

these long geological periods, but there was no way<br />

to de-<br />

termine their durations (except very roughly), their speeds<br />

<strong>of</strong> development, or precisely when they happened. It was<br />

convenient to assume that they had endured for hundreds <strong>of</strong><br />

thousands or for millions <strong>of</strong> years, though no real evidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> this existed. A good instance is that <strong>of</strong> the Antarctic ice-<br />

cap, <strong>of</strong> which we shall hear more below.<br />

So far as the most recent division <strong>of</strong> geologic time, the<br />

Pleistocene, was concerned, geologists, with much more evidence<br />

to work from, saw that there had been at least four ice<br />

ages in a period <strong>of</strong> about 1,000,000 years. <strong>The</strong>y consequently<br />

proposed the idea that the Pleistocene was not at all like<br />

previous periods. It was exceptional, because it had so many<br />

ice ages. <strong>The</strong>y may have been misled <strong>by</strong> failure to take suffi-<br />

cient account <strong>of</strong> the fact that glacial evidence is very easily<br />

destroyed, and that, as we go further back into geological<br />

history, the mathematical chances <strong>of</strong> finding evidences <strong>of</strong><br />

glaciation, never very good, decrease <strong>by</strong> geometrical progression.<br />

Down to ten years ago and, indeed, until 1951 it was the<br />

considered judgment <strong>of</strong> geologists that the last ice age in<br />

North America, which they refer to as the Wisconsin glacia-<br />

tion, began about 150,000 years ago, and ended about 30,000<br />

years ago.<br />

This opinion appeared to be based upon strong evidence.<br />

<strong>The</strong> estimates <strong>of</strong> the date <strong>of</strong> the end <strong>of</strong> the ice age were supported<br />

<strong>by</strong> the careful counting <strong>of</strong> clay varves (6) and <strong>by</strong><br />

numerous seemingly reliable estimates <strong>of</strong> the age <strong>of</strong> Niagara<br />

Falls. As a consequence, experts were contemptuous <strong>of</strong> all<br />

those who, for one reason or another, attempted to argue that<br />

the ice age was more recent. One <strong>of</strong> these was Drayson, whose<br />

theory called for a very recent ice age. His followers produced

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!