02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE ICE AGES 43<br />

canic dust and carbon dioxide, and that is a displacement <strong>of</strong><br />

the crust. <strong>The</strong> extremely far-reaching consequences <strong>of</strong> a dis-<br />

placement <strong>of</strong> the crust with respect to atmospheric condi-<br />

tions, and the importance <strong>of</strong> the atmospheric effects <strong>of</strong> a<br />

displacement for other questions, will be discussed in Chapters<br />

VII and VIII.<br />

<strong>The</strong> theories listed above were attacked <strong>by</strong> Coleman, who<br />

complained that they were entirely intangible and unprovable.<br />

He said:<br />

Such vague and accidental causes for climatic change should be<br />

appealed to only as a last resort unless positive pro<strong>of</strong> some time becomes<br />

available showing that an event <strong>of</strong> the kind actually took<br />

place (87:282).<br />

Another group <strong>of</strong> theories attempts to explain ice ages as<br />

the results <strong>of</strong> changes in the positions <strong>of</strong> the earth and the<br />

sun* <strong>The</strong>se are <strong>of</strong> two kinds: changes in the distance between<br />

the earth and the sun at particular times because <strong>of</strong> changes<br />

in the shape <strong>of</strong> the earth's orbit, and changes in the angle <strong>of</strong><br />

inclination <strong>of</strong> the earth's axis, which occur regularly as the<br />

result <strong>of</strong> precession. <strong>The</strong> argument that precession was the<br />

cause <strong>of</strong> ice ages was advanced <strong>by</strong> Drayson in the last century<br />

(117). <strong>The</strong> argument based on these astronomical changes<br />

has been brought up to date in the recent work <strong>of</strong> Brouwer<br />

and Van Woerkom (375: 147-58) and Emiliani (132). It now<br />

seems that these astronomical changes may produce cyclical<br />

changes in the distribution <strong>of</strong> the sun's heat, and perhaps in<br />

the amount <strong>of</strong> the sun's heat retained <strong>by</strong> the earth, but it is<br />

agreed, <strong>by</strong> Emiliani and others, that <strong>by</strong> itself the insolation<br />

curve or net temperature difference would not be sufficient<br />

to cause an ice age without the operation <strong>of</strong> other factors,<br />

and so Emiliani suggests that perhaps changes in elevation<br />

coinciding with the cool phases <strong>of</strong> the insolation curve may<br />

have caused the Pleistocene ice ages. One weakness <strong>of</strong> this<br />

suggestion is, <strong>of</strong> course, the necessity to suppose two inde-<br />

pendent causes for ice ages.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is another objection to be advanced against all

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!