The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

40
EARTH'S SHIFTING CRUST
as lowered temperatures. If, however, precipitation was then greater
over certain areas of the earth's surface than it is at present, a corollary
seems to be implied that over other large areas evaporation was
greater than normal to supply increased precipitation, and hence in
these latter areas the climate was warmer than normal. This seems at
first to be an astonishing conclusion. . . . We might propose the
hypothesis that climatic conditions were far from steady in any one
area, but were subject to large shifts, and that intervals of ameliorated
conditions in some regions coincided with increased severity in others.
The Pleistocene, then, may have been a period of sharper contrasts
of climate and of shifting climates rather than a period of greater
cold" (405:815-16).
From a number of points of view, the foregoing passage is
extremely remarkable. Stokes recognizes the fact that the
basic assumption of contemporary geologists regarding the
glacial periods is in conflict with the laws of physics. Then, in
the passage he quotes, he draws attention to the implications,
which seem to point directly to crust displacement, for in
what other way can we explain how one part of the earth's
surface was colder and another, at the same time, warmer
than at present?
One of the arguments that is advanced in support of the
assumption of world-wide periods of colder weather (which
remains the generally accepted assumption of glaciologists)
has its basis in geological evidence purporting to prove that
ice ages occurred simultaneously in both hemispheres. A
decade ago, however, Kroeber pointed to the essential weak-
ness of this geological evidence, when he showed the difficulty
of correlating stratified deposits of different areas with each
other:
. . . There is plenty of geologic evidence, in many parts of the
earth, of changes of climates, especially between wet and dry areas;
and some of these happened in the Pleistocene. But the correlation of
such changes as they occurred in widely separated regions, and espe-
cially as between permanently ice-free and glaciated areas, is an intri-
cate, tricky, and highly technical matter, on which the anthropological
student must take the word of geologists and climatologists, and these
are by no means in agreement. They may be reasonably sure of one
series of climatic successions in one region, and of another in a second