02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CAMPBELL'S MECHANISM 375<br />

as a result, the centrifugal momentum not compensated <strong>by</strong><br />

gravity has now been reduced to one one hundredth <strong>of</strong> the<br />

quantity <strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> the ice mass when it was totally<br />

uncompensated.<br />

It appears, therefore, that the question as to whether a<br />

mass is in isostatic adjustment or not is the essence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

matter. <strong>The</strong> icecap, if totally uncompensated, may produce<br />

a centrifugal effect one hundred times the Eotvos effect for<br />

the same mass; furthermore, it may be calculated <strong>by</strong> the<br />

formula used <strong>by</strong> Campbell, with the reservation that a small<br />

poleward component <strong>of</strong> gravity caused <strong>by</strong> the oblateness <strong>of</strong><br />

the earth and proportional to the degree <strong>of</strong> the oblateness<br />

must be taken into consideration.<br />

Let us attempt to define and clarify this poleward component<br />

<strong>of</strong> the force <strong>of</strong> gravity, and to estimate its probable rela-<br />

tive magnitude. It applies both to masses in equilibrium but<br />

with elevated centers <strong>of</strong> gravity, and to any mass resting on<br />

the earth's surface but uncompensated. Its effect will be<br />

in the latter case than in the former. In both cases it<br />

greater<br />

will tend to counteract the equatorward component <strong>of</strong> the<br />

centrifugal effect <strong>of</strong> the icecap.<br />

<strong>The</strong> poleward component <strong>of</strong> the force <strong>of</strong> gravity results<br />

from the oblateness <strong>of</strong> the earth. It may be visualized as follows:<br />

if you should place a marble at the equator, and if the<br />

rotation <strong>of</strong> the earth should be interrupted so that the earth<br />

would be at rest, then the marble would tend to roll toward<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the poles, because the poles are closer to the center <strong>of</strong><br />

the earth, and therefore downhill. As I have mentioned, this<br />

applies both to masses out <strong>of</strong> isostatic equilibrium, and to<br />

those in equilibrium, but with elevated centers <strong>of</strong> gravity<br />

(that is, to masses standing higher because <strong>of</strong> their lesser aver-<br />

age density). However, as I have pointed out, there will be a<br />

quantitative difference between the poleward effects <strong>of</strong> gravity<br />

in these two cases <strong>of</strong> about 100:1.<br />

In both cases these effects would tend to counterbalance<br />

the equatorward component <strong>of</strong> the total centrifugal effect <strong>of</strong><br />

the icecap. <strong>The</strong> question is: What proportion <strong>of</strong> the equator-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!