02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

374<br />

EARTH'S SHIFTING CRUST<br />

to counteract this, the rotation <strong>of</strong> the earth, acting on this<br />

mass <strong>of</strong> ten times normal density, would produce a centrifugal<br />

effect ten times as great as the one normally balanced at<br />

that point <strong>by</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> gravity. Let us note the fact that<br />

the assumption that this slab is not isostatically compensated<br />

involves the consequence that the centrifugal momentum<br />

resulting from it is not compensated.<br />

<strong>The</strong> difference between an Eotvos effect and one produced<br />

<strong>by</strong> an uncompensated mass may be illustrated in another<br />

way. Let us return to our example <strong>of</strong> a mass <strong>of</strong> ice. Campbell<br />

has suggested the example <strong>of</strong> an iceberg before and after its<br />

separation from its parent, land-based icecap. It is assumed<br />

that the is icecap uncompensated. <strong>The</strong> iceberg, breaking <strong>of</strong>f<br />

from the icecap, falls into the water. Before this event the<br />

surface <strong>of</strong><br />

icecap, <strong>by</strong> assumption, is outside the equilibrium<br />

the geoid; the rotation <strong>of</strong> the earth acts it upon precisely as<br />

the rotation <strong>of</strong> Brown's model sphere acts upon the weight<br />

fixed to its surface.<br />

But let us see what happens when the iceberg falls into<br />

the sea. It now reaches gravitational equilibrium. It sinks,<br />

and displaces its weight in water. It is now a part <strong>of</strong> the equi-<br />

potential surface <strong>of</strong> the geoid (though the portion projecting<br />

above sea level is not, and therefore exerts an Eotvos effect).<br />

Now what is the quantitative relationship between the<br />

Eotvos effect and the original centrifugal effect <strong>of</strong> the ice-<br />

berg? It is plain<br />

that now nine tenths <strong>of</strong> the ice is within<br />

the equilibrium surface. For this nine tenths <strong>of</strong> the mass the<br />

equatorward centrifugal momentum produced <strong>by</strong> the earth's<br />

rotation is precisely cancelled <strong>by</strong> the poleward component <strong>of</strong><br />

the force <strong>of</strong> gravity at that point, so that there is no net centrifugal<br />

effect. Only one tenth <strong>of</strong> the ice remains to exert an<br />

effect, and the quantity <strong>of</strong> this effect, furthermore, is determined<br />

<strong>by</strong> the elevation <strong>of</strong> the center <strong>of</strong> gravity <strong>of</strong> this<br />

tenth <strong>of</strong> the iceberg above sea level. But the elevation has<br />

been enormously reduced. It has, in fact, been reduced to one<br />

tenth <strong>of</strong> the elevation <strong>of</strong> the center <strong>of</strong> gravity before the fall<br />

<strong>of</strong> the iceberg into the sea. Campbell has pointed out that,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!