02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

368<br />

EARTH'S SHIFTING CRUST<br />

mined <strong>by</strong> the fixed positions <strong>of</strong> the pivots set into the ring.<br />

Now, if, instead <strong>of</strong> fixing the ring into a stand, or pediment,<br />

we set it into another, larger ring, <strong>by</strong> inserting two<br />

pivots into the larger ring at two points at right angles to<br />

those <strong>of</strong> the inner ring, we have an axis within an axis, and<br />

the globe can be made to rotate in either direction. If a third<br />

ring is used, then the globe has freedom <strong>of</strong> action in any<br />

direction whatever.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is still the problem <strong>of</strong> imparting momentum to this<br />

globe. Since it has no fixed axis, this is a difficult problem.<br />

Brown solved it <strong>by</strong> suspending the device to the ceiling <strong>by</strong><br />

a string attached to the outermost trunnion. This string<br />

could be wound up <strong>by</strong> rotating the outermost trunnion in<br />

one direction <strong>by</strong> hand for a while, just as a boy may wind<br />

up the rubber bands used to give momentum to a toy air-<br />

plane. <strong>The</strong>n, when the trunnion is released, the string un-<br />

winds, putting the globe itself in rapid rotation, but a free<br />

rotation, one not confined to a fixed axis.<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> continued skepticism, I could not be entirely<br />

satisfied <strong>by</strong> the Maxwell statement, supported though it<br />

might be <strong>by</strong> the demonstration. Since I am not myself a<br />

physicist, I felt it not unlikely that some persons would conclude<br />

that, in the first<br />

place, I had misunderstood Maxwell,<br />

and that, in the second place, I was incapable <strong>of</strong> interpreting<br />

correctly the evidence <strong>of</strong> my eyes. I therefore wished to obtain<br />

an authoritative interpretation <strong>of</strong> Maxwell's statement,<br />

and, accordingly, I wrote Dr. Harlow Shapley,<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Harvard Observatory, as follows:<br />

the Director<br />

After a year <strong>of</strong> intensive work with a group <strong>of</strong> people here, I have<br />

concluded that the work we are doing is dependent upon a clear<br />

answer to the question as to whether the geographical poles are stabi-<br />

lized <strong>by</strong> the momentum <strong>of</strong> rotation <strong>of</strong> the earth, or solely <strong>by</strong> that <strong>of</strong><br />

the equatorial bulge. I have had discussions about this with Dr.<br />

Adams <strong>of</strong> the Coast and Geodetic Survey, and with Dr. Clemence <strong>of</strong><br />

the Naval Observatory. <strong>The</strong>y have given me references to the work<br />

<strong>of</strong> Clerk Maxwell and others, without quite satisfying me. I am not,<br />

<strong>of</strong> course, equipped to understand all <strong>of</strong> the technicalities, but I am

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!