02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

334<br />

EARTH'S SHIFTING CRUST<br />

<strong>The</strong> sequence radiation-intrazonal evolution is usual, simply be-<br />

cause radiation does not occur unless there are diverse zones within<br />

which evolution will follow. Occasionally, nevertheless, something<br />

happens to close the zones so soon that radiation is curtailed, or the<br />

intrazonal phase is even shorter than the radiation. <strong>The</strong> camariate<br />

crinoids, for instance, seem to have been in the full swing <strong>of</strong> a radia-<br />

tion when they all became extinct in the Carboniferous. . . . (390:<br />

232).<br />

We note that Dr. Simpson says, "something happens." What<br />

happens? He does not care to suggest what might happen to<br />

close the zones, to curtail the radiation, to destroy the species.<br />

No one has ever suggested a reasonable explanation <strong>of</strong> these<br />

things, but they can be understood as effects <strong>of</strong> repeated displacements<br />

<strong>of</strong> the crust.<br />

Dr. Simpson has remarked elsewhere that he does not ob-<br />

ject to the analogy <strong>of</strong> the species and the individual, provided<br />

it may be allowed that youth may follow maturity, and may<br />

occur more than once!<br />

Not only may phases occur in the wrong order, and be<br />

repeated, but also some may be omitted altogether. This<br />

seems particularly true <strong>of</strong> the last, or so-called senile, period.<br />

No concept has had so wide a currency with so little support<br />

in evidence as that <strong>of</strong> the alleged degeneration <strong>of</strong> species.<br />

<strong>The</strong> reasoning behind it is essentially specious: if a form <strong>of</strong><br />

life becomes extinct, and if some "exaggerated" trait can be<br />

pointed to, which might have produced this extinction, then<br />

it is claimed that the species was degenerate. This is, <strong>of</strong><br />

course, merely hindsight, because it ignores<br />

the fact that<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the oddest creatures in the world have lasted for<br />

millions <strong>of</strong> years and still exist. It is true that some kinds <strong>of</strong><br />

plants and animals become adapted to very narrowly specialized<br />

environments, so that an almost imperceptible change<br />

in the environment may destroy them. <strong>The</strong>se forms may, if<br />

you like, be called overspecialized, but they cannot be called<br />

degenerate. No inner process <strong>of</strong> decay has taken place in the<br />

organism.<br />

Its extinction results from the external circum-<br />

stance that destroys its relationship with its environment. Is<br />

the specialist, who has spent his entire life in the study <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!