02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

318<br />

EARTH'S SHIFTING CRUST<br />

geological eras would provide insufficient time for evolution.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Dodson wrote:<br />

In nature, neither mutation nor selection will ordinarily occur<br />

alone, and so the two will act simultaneously, perhaps in the same<br />

direction, perhaps in opposite directions. . . . Most frequently, selec-<br />

tion will work against mutation, as the majority <strong>of</strong> possible mutations<br />

are deleterious. This will result in very slow change, if any. . . .<br />

(115:298).<br />

He emphasized:<br />

It appears that it is extremely difficult for mild selection pressures,<br />

unaided <strong>by</strong> any other factor, to establish a new dominant gene in a<br />

species. . . . (115:298).<br />

By "mild selection pressure/'<br />

Dodson means those condi-<br />

tions <strong>of</strong> competition between life forms pointed out <strong>by</strong> Darwin,<br />

that is, the competition that goes on at all times. What<br />

he suggests here is that some more drastic influence must<br />

have operated to produce evolutionary change.<br />

After discussing Haldane's mathematical calculations indi-<br />

cating the astronomical numbers <strong>of</strong> generations that might<br />

be required to change a plant or animal under the influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> mild selection pressures, Dodson quotes Dobzhansky (the<br />

leader <strong>of</strong> the neo-Darwinian school) on their implications:<br />

. . . <strong>The</strong> number <strong>of</strong> generations needed for the change may, however,<br />

be so tremendous that the efficiency <strong>of</strong> selection alone as an<br />

evolutionary agent may be open to doubt, and this even if time on a<br />

geological scale is involved (115:298).<br />

Thus the problem is clearly posed: it is the problem <strong>of</strong><br />

time. It is necessary to find some way <strong>of</strong> explaining how<br />

natural selection can have operated at a sufficiently rapid<br />

rate to account for evolution. A factor <strong>of</strong> acceleration is re-<br />

quired.<br />

Some writers, when they saw that evolution could not be<br />

explained even with the enormous amounts <strong>of</strong> time available<br />

under the current concepts <strong>of</strong> the lengths <strong>of</strong> the geological<br />

periods, felt compelled to revert to mystical explanations.<br />

Writers such as du Noiiy (119) concluded that evolution was

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!