02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LIFE 317<br />

an entirely accidental process rendered the mathematical<br />

chances against the coincidence <strong>of</strong> many mutations in one<br />

individual or in one line o individuals completely over-<br />

whelming.<br />

But this was <strong>by</strong> no means the only difficulty. <strong>The</strong> anti-<br />

mutationists could argue that since mutations were purely<br />

accidental changes in the hereditary factors, and did not<br />

occur in response to needs created <strong>by</strong> the environment, most<br />

mutations would be positively harmful, or at least negative,<br />

and would have no effect on the adaptation <strong>of</strong> the organism<br />

to its environment. Only a chance mutation now and then<br />

could help an organism to survive. Mutationists were unable<br />

to show the existence <strong>of</strong> any principle <strong>by</strong> which mutations<br />

would be adaptive, that is, brought about as a part<br />

<strong>of</strong> an<br />

effort <strong>of</strong> an organism to adapt to the environment. Some<br />

recent experiments indicate that such adaptive mutation<br />

may occur, perhaps under special and rare conditions, but<br />

it still cannot be shown that adaptation <strong>by</strong> mutation has been<br />

an important factor in evolution.<br />

<strong>The</strong> mutationists did establish, <strong>of</strong> course, that minor muta-<br />

tions were <strong>of</strong> frequent occurrence, and might even be in-<br />

duced artificially; therefore, evolutionists accepted them, but<br />

they recognized them as just another way <strong>of</strong> accounting for<br />

the occurrence <strong>of</strong> variations. <strong>The</strong> law <strong>of</strong> natural selection<br />

would still be required, in order to eliminate the harmful<br />

mutations, which would constitute the great majority <strong>of</strong> all<br />

mutations. For a while it seemed that, in this way, the basic<br />

question <strong>of</strong> evolution was answered.<br />

It soon appeared that this was very far from being the<br />

case. <strong>The</strong> acceptance <strong>of</strong> mutations <strong>by</strong> the Darwinians as a<br />

factor in evolution did not solve the problem. It became<br />

clear, as time passed, that a major difficulty remained. Attention<br />

was concentrated on the rate at which mutation and<br />

natural selection could be effective in changing life forms.<br />

Mathematical studies showed that such changes would take<br />

place, according to the theory, at rates so slow that even long

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!