02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EARTH'S SHIFTING CRUST<br />

deposition <strong>of</strong> the sediments) will probably completely obliterate every<br />

trace <strong>of</strong> glaciation which the land surface may once have pre-<br />

sented. . . .<br />

<strong>The</strong> only evidence <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong> land ice during former<br />

periods which we can reasonably expect to meet with in the stratified<br />

rocks, consists <strong>of</strong> erratic blocks which may have been transported <strong>by</strong><br />

icebergs and dropped into the sea. But unless the glaciers <strong>of</strong> such<br />

periods reached the sea, we could not possibly possess even this evidence.<br />

Traces in the stratified rocks <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> land-ice during<br />

former epochs must, in the nature <strong>of</strong> things, be rare indeed (91:267-<br />

69).<br />

Croll was interested in pointing out the impermanence <strong>of</strong><br />

glacial evidence. He continued, therefore, as follows:<br />

<strong>The</strong> reason why we now have, comparatively speaking, so little<br />

direct evidence <strong>of</strong> former glacial periods will be more forcibly im-<br />

pressed upon the mind, if we reflect on how difficult it would be in a<br />

million or so <strong>of</strong> years hence to find any trace <strong>of</strong> what we now call the<br />

glacial epoch. <strong>The</strong> striated stones would <strong>by</strong> that time be all, or nearly<br />

all, disintegrated, and the till washed away and deposited in the<br />

bottom <strong>of</strong> the sea as stratified sands and clays. . . . (91:270).<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> the facts presented <strong>by</strong> Croll, it would appear to<br />

be most unreasonable to insist on any fixed number <strong>of</strong><br />

Pleistocene glaciations simply because hitherto it has been<br />

possible to group, in a very rough way, the comparatively<br />

few evidences we have in four glacial periods.<br />

It is a well-known fact that the chronology <strong>of</strong> four Pleisto-<br />

cene glaciations has been built up on the foundation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

assumption that all glacial epochs were the result <strong>of</strong> lowered<br />

world temperatures. Thus the European glaciations were<br />

declared to have been contemporary with the glaciations in<br />

America, although, as a matter <strong>of</strong> fact, no evidence <strong>of</strong> this<br />

existed. <strong>The</strong> assumption was based solely on astronomical<br />

and other theories <strong>of</strong> the causes <strong>of</strong> glaciation that we have<br />

shown to be inadequate. If the grouping <strong>of</strong> all European<br />

glacial evidences into only four major glaciations is questionable,<br />

and if, in addition, there is no good evidence that<br />

these glaciations were really contemporary with those in<br />

America, then the possibility <strong>of</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong> different

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!