02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

278<br />

EARTH'S SHIFTING CRUST<br />

2. Weakness <strong>of</strong> the Accepted Glacial Chronology<br />

Geologists are used to thinking <strong>of</strong> four major glaciations<br />

during the million-year period <strong>of</strong> the Pleistocene. <strong>The</strong>y have<br />

assumed that each glaciation<br />

affected the earth as a whole<br />

simultaneously, causing ice sheets in both Northern and<br />

Southern Hemispheres, and lowered temperatures generally.<br />

Some geologists have questioned this concept <strong>of</strong> four glaciations;<br />

it is at least necessary to recognize several successive<br />

phases <strong>of</strong> advance and retreat for the older glaciations.<br />

Whether these interruptions were merely interstadials, like<br />

those <strong>of</strong> the Wisconsin glaciation, or were true interglacials<br />

it is increasingly hard to decide the further back in time one<br />

goes. According to the accompanying chart <strong>of</strong> the glacial<br />

periods (p. 282), it is evident that the intervals between the<br />

different stages <strong>of</strong> the major glacial periods are in some cases<br />

longer than the entire duration <strong>of</strong> the Wisconsin glaciation.<br />

It does not seem reasonable, therefore, to insist that they<br />

were merely interstadials, nor, consequently, to insist upon<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> just four glaciations during the Pleistocene.<br />

This becomes more apparent when we consider the implications<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Eurasian continental glaciation mentioned<br />

above. This, obviously, makes at least a fifth Pleistocene<br />

glaciation, but the matter does not end there. <strong>The</strong> question<br />

must be asked, If European geologists could overlook the<br />

evidences <strong>of</strong> this comparatively recent glaciation until the<br />

last decade (and this in spite <strong>of</strong> the fact that the evidences<br />

were spread widely over two continents, and had attracted<br />

the attention <strong>of</strong> Russian geologists as long as seventy-five<br />

years ago), how many other glaciations in various parts <strong>of</strong><br />

the world may not have escaped attention? Flint has pointed<br />

out how easily glacial evidence can be destroyed (342:171),<br />

Coleman also emphasized the same thing:<br />

It might be supposed that so important a change would leave be-<br />

hind it evidence that no one could dispute, and that there should be<br />

no room for doubt as to what happened in so recent a time <strong>of</strong> the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!