02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

224<br />

EARTH'S SHIFTING CRUST<br />

<strong>of</strong> the islands, and their separation from Asia, are attributed<br />

to deformation <strong>of</strong> the earth's crust itself. Moreover, it is un-<br />

likely that Smith had any conception <strong>of</strong> how recently these<br />

events occurred. He probably thought <strong>of</strong> the Pleistocene (and<br />

the ice age) as ending 20,000 or 30,000 years ago. Conse-<br />

quently, the structural changes<br />

in the crust that he discusses<br />

seem to have occurred at a rate which, like the unwarping<br />

<strong>of</strong> the crust in North America discussed <strong>by</strong> Antevs, is in-<br />

consistent with the speeds <strong>of</strong> geological change normally<br />

considered <strong>by</strong> geologists. <strong>The</strong>re appears to be no rational<br />

explanation for such an acceleration <strong>of</strong> the tempo <strong>of</strong> geolog-<br />

ical change, except a displacement <strong>of</strong> the crust.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is another important problem connected with the<br />

changes in sea level. It seems that many <strong>of</strong> them occurred in<br />

an abrupt fashion, so suddenly that the continuous cutting<br />

<strong>of</strong> the coastline <strong>by</strong> the sea was unable to keep up with the<br />

vertical movement <strong>of</strong> the land. Brooks refers to numerous<br />

strandlines at elevations <strong>of</strong> about 90, 126, and 180 feet above<br />

the present sea level, which may be traced over considerable<br />

areas (52:491). It seems reasonable that if the rise <strong>of</strong> the land<br />

in these localities (or the general fall <strong>of</strong> the sea) was gradual,<br />

the erosive action <strong>of</strong> the sea would have been able to keep<br />

extending the beach downward continuously. We would<br />

then have a continuous beach formation extending from 180<br />

feet above the present sea level, down to the present sea<br />

margin. We have, on the contrary, a series <strong>of</strong> completely<br />

distinct elevated beaches. It would seem that the changes in<br />

elevation were comparatively rapid.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is a possibility that this phenomenon is connected<br />

with the irregularities <strong>of</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> crust displacement<br />

referred to above. If the interstadials and the repeated re-<br />

advances <strong>of</strong> the glaciers during the North American ice age<br />

resulted from the process I have described, the same process<br />

<strong>of</strong> storage and sudden release <strong>of</strong> stresses in the moving crust<br />

could easily account for abrupt changes in the elevation <strong>of</strong><br />

sections <strong>of</strong> the crust. I am not suggesting that they occurred<br />

in periods <strong>of</strong> a few days or hours. <strong>The</strong> facts would be satisfied

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!