02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EARTH'S SHIFTING CRUST<br />

would suffice to raise the sea level between 200 and 300 feet.<br />

Half <strong>of</strong> it, therefore, would account for the amount <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fall in sea level noted <strong>by</strong> Anderson.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is a widespread impression that the sea level is now<br />

rising all over the world, but this impression seems to be mis-<br />

taken. It is natural, considering the widely publicized opin-<br />

ion that all present-day icecaps are in retreat, that people<br />

should rush to interpret a relative rise <strong>of</strong> the sea level at a<br />

few localities as indications <strong>of</strong> a general rise, caused <strong>by</strong> the<br />

assumed current melting <strong>of</strong> ice in both hemispheres. An<br />

examination <strong>of</strong> the data on which this claim is based shows,<br />

however, that the evidence is quite insufficient. I recently<br />

made an inquiry <strong>of</strong> the United States Coast and Geodetic<br />

Survey regarding this matter and received in reply<br />

a com-<br />

munication from Dr. H. E. Finnegan, Chief <strong>of</strong> the Division<br />

<strong>of</strong> Tides and Currents, in which he stated:<br />

. . . Long period tide records from control stations maintained<br />

<strong>by</strong> the Coast and Geodetic Survey show that there has been a relative<br />

rise <strong>of</strong> sea-level along each <strong>of</strong> the coasts <strong>of</strong> the United States.<br />

<strong>The</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> rise varies somewhat with the length <strong>of</strong> series and dif-<br />

ferent regions. During the<br />

past 20 years the relative rise <strong>of</strong> sea-level<br />

along our East Coast has been at the rate <strong>of</strong><br />

a foot per year. On our Pacific Coast the rate<br />

two hundredths <strong>of</strong><br />

has been somewhat<br />

less.<br />

In Alaska, the tide records for Ketchikan show no definite change<br />

in sea-level. At certain places farther north, however, the records<br />

indicate a relative fall <strong>of</strong> sea-level. . . . (152).<br />

This can, I think, be regarded as a summary <strong>of</strong> the facts<br />

presently known on this subject. It is plain that it does not<br />

add up to any universal rise <strong>of</strong> the sea level. Not only is no<br />

such rise indicated; exactly the opposite is implied <strong>by</strong> the<br />

facts. <strong>The</strong> facts show that different parts <strong>of</strong> the United States<br />

are subsiding at different rates, that Alaska is not subsiding<br />

at all, and that places farther north are actually rising. What<br />

reason is there to bring the sea into it? A "eustatic" change in<br />

sea level is not indicated <strong>by</strong> these facts, but differential movements<br />

<strong>of</strong> parts <strong>of</strong> the continent are. Moreover, the data come

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!