02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NORTH AMERICA AT THE POLE 221<br />

variation o gravity with latitude (Chapter IV). An equatorward<br />

movement <strong>of</strong> such an area would cause extra subsidence<br />

more than would occur with an area in isostatic equilibrium<br />

at the start <strong>of</strong> the movement. And subsequently, iso-<br />

static adjustment would re-elevate the area, but not to its<br />

original, excessive extent. This interpretation <strong>of</strong> the rebound<br />

<strong>of</strong> the glaciated tracts has the advantage that it can reconcile<br />

the facts there with the point <strong>of</strong> view expressed <strong>by</strong> Gilluly,<br />

and with the data from other parts <strong>of</strong> the world that so<br />

greatly puzzled Daly.<br />

While there is no evidence that the sea level rose all over<br />

the world and to the same extent everywhere at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the ice age, there is a good deal <strong>of</strong> evidence that it has fallen<br />

somewhat since. One specialist in this field, Anderson, re-<br />

ported evidence <strong>of</strong> a fall <strong>of</strong> sea level amounting to between<br />

100 and 140 feet, and extending over a vast area. He made a<br />

point <strong>of</strong> emphasizing that this could not be explained <strong>by</strong><br />

the postglacial isostatic rebound <strong>of</strong> the formerly glaciated<br />

tracts <strong>of</strong> North America and Scandinavia. He is thoroughly<br />

puzzled <strong>by</strong> what seems to him an inexplicable fact:<br />

. . . what was the cause <strong>of</strong> a fall in sea-level at a time when it<br />

should have been rising owing to the melting <strong>of</strong> the ice? (4:493).<br />

This fall <strong>of</strong> sea level is a matter <strong>of</strong> very great interest. I<br />

have already suggested that down to the disappearance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

glaciers in the Northern Hemisphere, the melt water from<br />

them may have pretty well balanced the growth <strong>of</strong> ice in<br />

Antarctica, so that there was no important change <strong>of</strong> sea level.<br />

With the disappearance <strong>of</strong> those northern ice sheets, how-<br />

ever, the situation changed. <strong>The</strong>re was now no longer a<br />

supply<br />

<strong>of</strong> melt water to balance the withdrawal <strong>of</strong> water to<br />

be locked up in the form <strong>of</strong> snow in Antarctica; consequently<br />

the sea level had to fall. Even the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the fall is in<br />

agreement, if we suppose that <strong>by</strong> about 10,000 years ago,<br />

when the northern icecaps dwindled away, the Antarctic<br />

For it is estimated that if the whole<br />

icecap was half grown.<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> ice now in Antarctica were suddenly melted, it

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!