02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

220 EARTH S SHIFTING CRUST<br />

ically to be expected. <strong>The</strong>n, as the western side <strong>of</strong> the Atlantic<br />

was closer to the meridian <strong>of</strong> maximum displacement,<br />

it would have been displaced through more degrees <strong>of</strong> lati-<br />

tude, and in consequence there should have been greater<br />

subsidence on the American side <strong>of</strong> the ocean. Our theory<br />

implies that the Hudson Bay region was moved southward<br />

about 2,000 miles, while at the same time the southward<br />

movement <strong>of</strong> France amounted to no more than five hundred.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> these distances is about four to one, and<br />

this is very close to the estimated subsidence on the western<br />

side <strong>of</strong> the Atlantic, <strong>of</strong> about 1,000 feet, as compared to that<br />

on the eastern side, <strong>of</strong> less than 300.<br />

From the other side <strong>of</strong> the globe comes equally impressive<br />

evidence. Wallace argued for a subsidence <strong>of</strong> at least 600 feet<br />

<strong>of</strong> the coastlines <strong>of</strong> Southeast Asia and Indonesia at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the Pleistocene. <strong>The</strong>se areas lie close to the same meridian<br />

<strong>of</strong> maximum displacement, the goth meridian, which runs<br />

through Labrador, and accordingly they should have been<br />

displaced the same distance as eastern North America, and<br />

the resulting subsidence should have been <strong>of</strong> the same order.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Philippines are thought to have become separated from<br />

Asia only some 10,000 years ago; the separation <strong>of</strong> New<br />

Guinea from Australia and <strong>of</strong> Java from Sumatra may have<br />

been even more recent. Again, the subsidence may have considerably<br />

exceeded 600 feet, which Wallace gives as a minimum<br />

(444:24-25). Needless to say, a rise <strong>of</strong> the sea level <strong>of</strong><br />

this extent cannot be explained as the result <strong>of</strong> melting <strong>of</strong><br />

glaciers.<br />

I have already mentioned the fact that some geophysicists<br />

seriously doubt that the rise <strong>of</strong> the land around the former<br />

glaciated tracts since the end <strong>of</strong> the ice age<br />

rebound. It may be more correctly accounted for as a part <strong>of</strong><br />

is due to isostatic<br />

the aftermath <strong>of</strong> the last displacement <strong>of</strong> the crust. We have<br />

seen that polar areas are, according to the theory,<br />

areas re-<br />

cently moved poleward. Accordingly, they have undergone<br />

compression and uplift, the major part <strong>of</strong> the uplift being<br />

due to the lag in isostatic readjustment <strong>of</strong> the crust to the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!