02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

: his<br />

: rock<br />

It is not easy to reconcile Jeffreys's views here with those<br />

I have quoted above regarding the decline <strong>of</strong> strength<br />

with increasing pressure in the crust. It is evident<br />

iat if Jeffreys is right, the theory <strong>of</strong> isostasy is reduced to<br />

shambles. But Daly presents a counterargument to show<br />

iat he is not right. He suggests that at great depths the vis-<br />

>sity would be so high that a comparatively<br />

sudden ac-<br />

imulation <strong>of</strong> strain from some cause could fracture the rock<br />

if it were a solid. Laboratory experiments conducted <strong>by</strong><br />

ridgman have shown that solids subjected to pressures so<br />

eat as to make them flow behaved in very peculiar fashion,<br />

hey would flow, but the flow would, at times, be interrupted<br />

f fracture and slip. Daly also quotes Gutenberg to the effect<br />

iat ". . . Whereas at normal depths the accumulation <strong>of</strong><br />

rain is made possible <strong>by</strong> the strength <strong>of</strong> the rocks, at the<br />

eater depths the high coefficient <strong>of</strong> viscosity is sufficient,<br />

id no conclusion as to strength can be drawn" (97:403).<br />

hus the counterargument is a strong one. All that is neces-<br />

ry, in fact, both for the theory <strong>of</strong> isostasy and for the theory<br />

: displacements <strong>of</strong> the crust is a thin layer <strong>of</strong> extreme weak-<br />

*ss at the top <strong>of</strong> the asthenosphere, where the viscosity<br />

ould be much less than at the greater depths.<br />

According to Daly, Jeffreys adopted his view because he<br />

>uld see no reason for the development <strong>of</strong> sudden stresses<br />

the greater depths. Daly argues that this cannot settle the<br />

atter; perhaps we shall eventually<br />

discover a sufficient<br />

Luse. Daly also says, when speaking <strong>of</strong> the earth's triaxiality,<br />

iat it means "stress at depths <strong>of</strong> thousands <strong>of</strong> kilometers"<br />

7:404). Putting two and two together, I would suggest that<br />

ie deep-focus earthquakes result from the triaxiality, and<br />

iat the stresses develop suddenly enough to exceed the lim-<br />

5 <strong>of</strong> the viscosity at that depth and cause fracture, because<br />

te triaxial bulges are not permanent features <strong>of</strong> the planet,<br />

it recent deformations, which must set up strains at con-<br />

ierable depths.<br />

Archibald Geikie describes experiments done a long time

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!