02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE SHAPE OF THE EARTH 183<br />

supposes that the lopsidedness <strong>of</strong> the internal shell may have<br />

resulted from the separation <strong>of</strong> the moon from the earth, at<br />

which time the bed <strong>of</strong> the Pacific may have been created.<br />

<strong>The</strong> arguments that once supported this theory <strong>of</strong> the origin<br />

<strong>of</strong> the moon have, in recent years, been gradually whittled<br />

away, until little remains <strong>of</strong> them. This, then, is also a hazardous<br />

speculation.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Daly's fertile mind has produced a third suggestion.<br />

He feels that perhaps the triaxiality may have resulted<br />

from the effects <strong>of</strong> continental drift, which he felt himself<br />

compelled to support because there was no other way<br />

to ex-<br />

plain the innumerable facts <strong>of</strong> paleontology and geology,<br />

many <strong>of</strong> which have been already cited in this book. We have<br />

seen, however, that continental drift will not do.<br />

It seems that all the arguments that Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Daly uses to<br />

support his suggestion that the triaxial protuberances are not<br />

supported <strong>by</strong> the crust, but from below the crust, fail to stand<br />

examination. <strong>The</strong>y are supported <strong>by</strong> no convincing mass <strong>of</strong><br />

evidence. <strong>The</strong>re is obviously a sort <strong>of</strong> desperate urgency<br />

about them. A strong need impels him to hoist them up. <strong>The</strong><br />

nature <strong>of</strong> this need is perfectly clear.<br />

<strong>The</strong> need is to save the theory <strong>of</strong> isostasy. It is to smooth<br />

the path in front <strong>of</strong> a theory that has a lot <strong>of</strong> useful applica-<br />

tions and has a great deal to be said for it. <strong>The</strong> theory is<br />

threatened <strong>by</strong> the unexplained anomalies referred to above;<br />

it is still more threatened <strong>by</strong> these massive distortions <strong>of</strong><br />

the shape <strong>of</strong> the planet, the triaxial protuberances. <strong>The</strong>y are<br />

wholly and absolutely irreconcilable with the known prin-<br />

ciples <strong>of</strong> physics, as opposed to speculations. Either the shape<br />

<strong>of</strong> the earth is established <strong>by</strong> the balance <strong>of</strong> the force <strong>of</strong> gravity<br />

and the centrifugal effect <strong>of</strong> the rotation, or it is not. <strong>The</strong><br />

geoid, so established, is distorted, and it proves impossible<br />

to explain the distortion either <strong>by</strong> the resistance <strong>of</strong> the crust<br />

to the aforementioned forces or <strong>by</strong> the (undemonstrated) lop-<br />

sidedness <strong>of</strong> the internal shell.<br />

But displacements <strong>of</strong> the earth's crust may explain the<br />

matter, and in the simplest possible fashion.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!