02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE SHAPE OF THE EARTH 171<br />

the flow-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> icebergs could not even be an important factor<br />

in reducing the rate <strong>of</strong> the annual increment <strong>of</strong> ice on the<br />

glacier (128). <strong>The</strong> general problem <strong>of</strong> the Antarctic icecap<br />

may be summarized thus:<br />

First, we know that there is never any considerable melting<br />

<strong>of</strong> snow in Antarctica. We have radioelement evidence <strong>of</strong> an<br />

enormous expansion <strong>of</strong> the icecap there in recent millennia.<br />

We also have evidence that it is now accumulating. We can<br />

add that studies carried out <strong>by</strong> Captain <strong>Charles</strong> W. Thomas,<br />

<strong>of</strong> the United States Coast Guard, <strong>of</strong> the radiolaria (minute<br />

organisms) contained in samples <strong>of</strong> bottom sediments from<br />

the Antarctic have recently convinced him that *<br />

'during the<br />

last 5,000 years the waters surrounding this continent (Antarctica)<br />

have been getting colder" (411) just as would have<br />

to be expected with a growing icecap.<br />

Secondly, if Antarctica has always been at the South Pole,<br />

what conceivable factor could have operated to prevent the<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> an icecap there until the comparatively recent<br />

Eocene Period, only about 60,000,000 years ago? Once an<br />

icecap had formed, what other factor could have interrupted<br />

the glaciation, so as to bring about the growth <strong>of</strong> luxuriant<br />

forests there in later periods? Since it has been shown that<br />

climatic zones like the present have clearly existed during<br />

the whole <strong>of</strong> geological history (Chapter III), would we not<br />

be justified in expecting the icecap to have accumulated con-<br />

tinuously in Antarctica at least since the first known pre-<br />

Cambrian ice age, about two billion years ago?<br />

Thirdly, Campbell has made the significant observation<br />

that the Antarctic icecap never melts, yet we know that ice<br />

sheets elsewhere on the globe have melted again and again.<br />

It has proved impossible to account for the ice sheets that<br />

once existed and melted away in areas now near the equator.<br />

Campbell points out that even if the rate <strong>of</strong> snowfall in<br />

Antarctica is low compared with the precipitation in warmer<br />

climates, yet the icecap has, in the oceans, an unlimited supply.<br />

It follows that, if the present icecap is not large enough

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!