02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

156<br />

EARTH'S SHIFTING CRUST<br />

umn <strong>of</strong> the crust (that is, a section extending from top to<br />

bottom <strong>of</strong> the crust) would be a shifting <strong>of</strong> light matter from<br />

one point to another under the bottom <strong>of</strong> the crust. This<br />

matter was discussed in the last chapter. While in that chapter<br />

relatively minor effects were considered, it is true, never-<br />

theless, that the shifting <strong>of</strong> light matter from one point under<br />

the crust to another could take place on a very large scale.<br />

What might be the upshot <strong>of</strong> all these changes during a<br />

displacement <strong>of</strong> the crust? <strong>The</strong> result might well be that<br />

while the distribution <strong>of</strong> light and heavy matter near the<br />

surface would be unchanged, its distribution (average density)<br />

between the surface and the bottom <strong>of</strong> the crust would<br />

be materially changed. This is undoubtedly the direction in<br />

which we must look for a solution <strong>of</strong> the problem <strong>of</strong> con-<br />

tinents and ocean basins, as a means <strong>of</strong> reconciling geophysi-<br />

cal ideas with the evidence <strong>of</strong> biology and geology.<br />

I cannot close without reference to a singular confirmation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the line <strong>of</strong> reasoning adopted in this chapter, which I find<br />

in Umbgrove's discussion <strong>of</strong> the work <strong>of</strong> the geologist Barrell,<br />

with whom he disagreed.<br />

Umbgrove is considering the question <strong>of</strong> the submergence<br />

<strong>of</strong> continents. It is clear from his discussion that Barrell's<br />

conception <strong>of</strong> the process requires a theory <strong>of</strong> crust displacement.<br />

Umbgrove states the problem thus: If we are to sup-<br />

pose the submergence <strong>of</strong> continents, we must either suppose<br />

a change in the amount <strong>of</strong> the ocean water, which, if it in-<br />

creased, could flood a continent (or several at once), or, if the<br />

water remained about the same in quantity, the submergence<br />

<strong>of</strong> one continent must be balanced <strong>by</strong> the elevation <strong>of</strong> an-<br />

other. He presents the findings <strong>of</strong> specialists to show that<br />

the quantity <strong>of</strong> water on the earth's surface has remained<br />

about the same, from the earliest times, and adds:<br />

Should one, nevertheless, cling to the theory <strong>of</strong> submerged conti-<br />

nents, the only alternative would be to assume that while vast blocks<br />

were being submerged in one area, parts <strong>of</strong> the ocean floor <strong>of</strong> almost<br />

identical size were being elevated in others. . . .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!