02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

148<br />

EARTH'S SHIFTING CRUST<br />

the flat tops are submerged anywhere<br />

from a few hundred<br />

feet to three miles below sea level.<br />

When these sea mounts were first discovered, they were<br />

explained in accordance with the theory <strong>of</strong> the permanence<br />

<strong>of</strong> ocean basins (210). It was proposed that as the sediments<br />

gathered in enormous thickness on the ocean floor through<br />

hundreds <strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> years, the floor actually gave way,<br />

and sank, taking the sea mounts down below sea level. This<br />

theory was undermined, <strong>of</strong> course, <strong>by</strong> the discovery that no<br />

such thick layer <strong>of</strong> sediments exists on the ocean floors, but<br />

that, on the contrary, the layer <strong>of</strong> sediments is in some places<br />

extremely thin, or even virtually nonexistent.<br />

Another line <strong>of</strong> evidence helps to dispose completely <strong>of</strong><br />

this explanation <strong>of</strong> sea mounts. Foraminifera are minute protozoa<br />

that live in the sea. <strong>The</strong>ir species vary with differences<br />

in the depth and temperature <strong>of</strong> the water in which they live,<br />

and those <strong>of</strong> past geological periods, found in fossil state,<br />

differ from living species. Studies <strong>of</strong> fossilized foraminifera<br />

from the tops <strong>of</strong> the sea mounts have revealed that they are<br />

much younger than the sea mounts have been assumed to<br />

be (197). Comparatively recent species have been gathered<br />

from the tops <strong>of</strong> sea mounts subsided to great depths. Unless<br />

turbidity currents could suffice to carry such deposits long<br />

distances across the ocean floor and then upwards to the tops<br />

<strong>of</strong> the sea mounts, another cause for the subsidence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sea mounts must be found. When we remember that Umbgrove<br />

referred to frequent upward and downward oscillations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the floor <strong>of</strong> the Pacific, resulting from an unknown cause,<br />

we can see that the idea <strong>of</strong> a gradual and continuous sub-<br />

sidence <strong>of</strong> the ocean floor under the weight <strong>of</strong> accumulating<br />

sediments is a singularly weak one, for even if the supposed<br />

layer <strong>of</strong> sediments existed, the theory still unaccountably<br />

<strong>of</strong> the sea bottom.<br />

ignores the recurring uplifts<br />

<strong>The</strong> foregoing considerations reveal the essential weakness<br />

<strong>of</strong> the conclusion that the seas that periodically invaded the<br />

continents were always shallow seas "epicontinental" seas,<br />

flooding the permanent continents. First there was land;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!