The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

136
EARTH'S SHIFTING CRUST
As we have seen, when the paleontologists studied the life
of the remote past they found the same thing. The distribu-
tions of the fossil plants and animals did not seem to pay
any attention to the present shapes or positions of the continents.
Therefore, not knowing what the geophysicists were
up to or not caring the biologists and paleontologists decided
between themselves that they were in need of some new
continents, or rather, in need of some old, now nonexistent
continents, or at least a large number of former land con-
nections across the present oceans. And so they went right
ahead, and invented them.
Wegener, of course, managed to explain a mass of evidence
by moving the continents (450:73-89). Since the refutation
of his theory, the same evidence needs a new explanation.
Dodson gave the evidence for a North Pacific land bridge
(not Behring Strait) based on the distributions of 156 genera
of plants (115:373). Gregory also produced evidence for a
Pacific land bridge (191). DeRance and Feilden presented the
evidence for a land connection between North America and
Europe in the early Carboniferous (319:!!, 331-32). Coleman,
basing himself no doubt on paleontological evidence,
remarked that "India has many times been connected with
Africa" (87:262).
Dodson reconstructed the history of the Isthmus of Panama,
as indicated by the distributions of fossil plants and
animals. According to him, North and South America were
connected in the Cretaceous and in the early Paleocene, but
later in the Paleocene, Panama was completely submerged.
During the following Eocene and Oligocene there were islands
but no continuous land in the area. The islands were completely
submerged late in the Oligocene. Land connection
between the continents was re-established in the Pliocene,
that is, very lately (115:375-76). It must be emphasized that
the explanation for all these land changes is missing. There
is no basis in the geological evidence for the assumption that
the isthmus was never more than just barely submerged.
There is no reason to exclude the possibility that it was rather