02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CONTINENTS AND OCEAN BASINS 1J3<br />

avoiding the issue, which, he observes, is the course too <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

taken.<br />

Daly's own guess will not do for us, because it is based both<br />

on the theory <strong>of</strong> an originally molten globe and on the theory<br />

<strong>of</strong> drifting continents. He suggests that when the earth was<br />

entirely molten, the lighter rock, which now forms the granitic<br />

foundations <strong>of</strong> the continents, was floating on top <strong>of</strong><br />

the heavier rock, <strong>of</strong> basaltic composition, and crystallized<br />

whole surface.<br />

first, making a thin layer over the planet's<br />

<strong>The</strong>n, for some reason (not entirely clear) all this lighter<br />

rock slid toward one hemisphere and piled up, making a<br />

supercontinent. Later this supercontinent broke up and<br />

drifted apart, as suggested <strong>by</strong> Wegener.<br />

Jeffreys<br />

also refers to the difference between the average<br />

chemical composition <strong>of</strong> the continents and that <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ocean floors. <strong>The</strong>re is a difference in the densities <strong>of</strong> the two<br />

kinds <strong>of</strong> rock, and this is the reason why<br />

the continents stand<br />

high and the ocean beds are low. But what brought about<br />

this difference <strong>of</strong> composition is itself unexplained. It is, says<br />

Jeffreys,<br />

. . . closely connected with the great problem <strong>of</strong> the origin <strong>of</strong> the<br />

division <strong>of</strong> the earth's surface into continents and ocean basins, which<br />

has not yet received any convincing explanation (239:159).<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Umbgrove also has admitted that the field is<br />

wide open to any reasonable speculation. He feels that he<br />

is confined to mere guessing, but justifies what he writes<br />

thus:<br />

. . . But why should we not enter [this field] if everyone who wants<br />

to join us in our geopoetic expedition into the unknown realm <strong>of</strong> the<br />

earth's early infancy is warned at the beginning that probably not a<br />

single step can be placed on solid ground? (430:241).<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> this state <strong>of</strong> affairs, I shall not apologize if, at<br />

times, in the course <strong>of</strong> this and the following chapter, I shall<br />

seem to the reader to be venturing beyond the point where<br />

speculation can be immediately checked <strong>by</strong> the facts. To a<br />

certain extent, my suggestions will be simply logical deduc-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!