02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

128 EARTH'S SHIFTING CRUST<br />

as <strong>of</strong>ten as is required <strong>by</strong> this theory, why would not the crust<br />

be universally folded to a far greater extent than it is?<br />

I think this objection has been partly answered where I<br />

pointed out that in a single displacement <strong>of</strong> the crust the<br />

folding would be comparatively slight, and that it would be<br />

confined to a small part <strong>of</strong> the earth's entire surface. I have<br />

the meridian <strong>of</strong> the<br />

suggested that it would be greatest along<br />

crust's maximum displacement, but that at some point be-<br />

tween this meridian and the two areas suffering no displace-<br />

ment, the compressions would tend to fall below the elastic<br />

limit <strong>of</strong> the crustal rocks, so that the crust would simply bend<br />

elastically, and then return to its original, apparently undisturbed<br />

position, in some subsequent movement. It may be<br />

added that most <strong>of</strong> the changes <strong>of</strong> elevation resulting from a<br />

displacement <strong>of</strong> the crust would tend to be epeirogenic that<br />

is, they would be broad uplifts or subsidences <strong>of</strong> large regions<br />

resulting from the tilting <strong>of</strong> great segments <strong>of</strong> the crust,<br />

rather than merely local deformations <strong>of</strong> the rock structures.<br />

Another point that may be urged in answer to this objec-<br />

tion is that, apparently, over considerable periods the poles<br />

have tended to be situated again and again in approximately<br />

the same areas, possibly owing to the configuration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

continents. This would result in leaving some areas far removed<br />

for long periods from the meridian <strong>of</strong> maximum dis-<br />

placement <strong>of</strong> the crust.<br />

12. <strong>The</strong> Chronology <strong>of</strong> Mountain Building<br />

Another objection that may be raised to this theory <strong>of</strong><br />

mountain building is that there are supposed to have been<br />

only a few great mountain-making epochs in the world's history<br />

<strong>of</strong> two or more billion years, and that these epochs have<br />

been separated <strong>by</strong> very long periods when mountains were<br />

eroded away, and no new ones made. I shall indicate two<br />

reasons for holding that this concept is an illusion.<br />

<strong>The</strong> first reason is that the record <strong>of</strong> the rocks is incom-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!