02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

124<br />

EARTH'S SHIFTING CRUST<br />

evennesses, corresponding to those at the surface, and that<br />

the crust varies considerably in thickness from place to place.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y think, for example, that the crust is thicker under the<br />

continental surfaces, and thinner under the oceans, and that<br />

it is thickest <strong>of</strong> all under mountain ranges and high plateaus.<br />

Continents and mountain ranges not only stick up higher<br />

but they also stick down deeper. That is because they are<br />

composed, as an average, <strong>of</strong> lighter rock. <strong>The</strong> analogy is to<br />

an iceberg. An iceberg floats with one tenth <strong>of</strong> its mass above<br />

sea level, and nine tenths <strong>of</strong> it submerged. It is lighter than<br />

water per unit volume, and floats in the water displacing its<br />

own weight, and leaving its own excess volume above the<br />

surface. Continents and mountain chains, composed on<br />

the average <strong>of</strong> lighter rock, stand in the same sort <strong>of</strong> hydro-<br />

static, gravitational balance, and their downward projections<br />

are thought to be much greater than their upward, visible<br />

projections. <strong>The</strong> downward projections <strong>of</strong> mountain chains<br />

are called "mountain roots."<br />

<strong>The</strong> underside <strong>of</strong> the crust, then, has a sort <strong>of</strong> negative<br />

geography. <strong>The</strong> features <strong>of</strong> the upper surface are repeated in<br />

reverse on the undersurface, although, naturally, the details<br />

are missing. <strong>The</strong> effects are rather smoothed out. We should<br />

expect that the Rocky Mountains would make a sizable<br />

bump on the underside <strong>of</strong> the crust, but we couldn't expect<br />

to find any small, sharp bump just under Pikes Peak. <strong>The</strong><br />

tensile strength <strong>of</strong> the crust, though limited,<br />

is sufficient to<br />

smooth out the minor features.<br />

As we attempt to envisage the situation at the bottom <strong>of</strong><br />

the crust, we must remember that the rocks are subjected to<br />

increasing pressure with depth, and probably to increasing<br />

heat, and as a consequence they must tend to lose their rigidity<br />

and strength. We don't just come suddenly to the bound-<br />

ary <strong>of</strong> the crust at a given depth. On the contrary, the crust<br />

just fades away. <strong>The</strong> rocks <strong>of</strong> the lowest part <strong>of</strong> the crust<br />

must be very weak indeed, so that a very slight lateral pressure<br />

may suffice to displace them.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!