02.04.2013 Views

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

The Earth's Shifting Crust by Charles Hapgood - wire of information

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE MOUNTAINS 91<br />

ments and possibly through a number <strong>of</strong> successive displacements<br />

<strong>of</strong> the crust, to the formation <strong>of</strong> folded mountain<br />

ranges.<br />

<strong>The</strong> systematic presentation <strong>of</strong> this theory requires us to<br />

consider the two different phases <strong>of</strong> displacement equatorward<br />

and poleward separately, for they have very different<br />

results. We will begin with the consideration <strong>of</strong> the effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> a displacement <strong>of</strong> a crustal sector toward the equator.<br />

In a shift in that direction, a crustal sector is submitted<br />

to tension (or stretching), and this tension is relieved <strong>by</strong> the<br />

fracturing that takes place when the bursting stress exerted<br />

on the crust has come to exceed the strength <strong>of</strong> the crust. (For<br />

Mr. Campbell's calculations <strong>of</strong> the quantity <strong>of</strong> the bursting<br />

stress, as compared with estimates <strong>of</strong> crustal strength, see<br />

Chapter XI.) Until fractures appear and multiply,<br />

the crust<br />

caijnot move over the bulge. After the fracturing permits<br />

the movement to begin, the crustal blocks tend to draw<br />

slightly apart. <strong>The</strong> spaces between them are immediately<br />

filled <strong>by</strong> molten material from below.<br />

Let us form a clear picture <strong>of</strong> this crustal stretching, from<br />

the quantitative standpoint. It is important to estimate the<br />

stretch per mile, if we are to visualize the results. Taking the<br />

globe as a whole, the difference between the polar and equatorial<br />

diameters is about 26 miles. <strong>The</strong> circumferences,<br />

therefore, differ <strong>by</strong> about 78 miles. If the crust were dis-<br />

placed so far that a point at a pole was displaced<br />

to the<br />

equator, the polar circumference would have to stretch 78<br />

miles to fit over the equator. This would amount to about<br />

17 feet in the mile. Since the magnitude <strong>of</strong> displacements,<br />

however (according to evidence to be presented later), seems<br />

to have been <strong>of</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> no more than about 30 degrees,<br />

or one third <strong>of</strong> the distance from pole to equator, the average<br />

stretch per mile may have amounted to five or six feet, or<br />

one foot in a thousand.<br />

It would be a mistake to visualize this stretching <strong>of</strong> the<br />

crust in the equatorward-moving areas as evenly distributed<br />

around the whole circumference <strong>of</strong> the globe. Obviously, the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!