Treatment of Micro Shrinkage in Ductile Iron with a FeSiLa Inoculant
Treatment of Micro Shrinkage in Ductile Iron with a FeSiLa Inoculant
Treatment of Micro Shrinkage in Ductile Iron with a FeSiLa Inoculant
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Treatment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Micro</strong><br />
<strong>Shr<strong>in</strong>kage</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ductile</strong> <strong>Iron</strong><br />
<strong>with</strong> a <strong>FeSiLa</strong> <strong>Inoculant</strong><br />
Steve Thelen<br />
Grede Biscoe<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
<strong>Shr<strong>in</strong>kage</strong> categories<br />
Suck Suck‐<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
0.2‐0.5 mm<br />
Macro<br />
<strong>Shr<strong>in</strong>kage</strong><br />
20 mm<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011<br />
<strong>Micro</strong><br />
<strong>Shr<strong>in</strong>kage</strong><br />
5 mm
<strong>Ductile</strong> <strong>Iron</strong> metallurgy: Solidification modes<br />
Temp °c<br />
1150 °C<br />
723 °C<br />
Hypoeutectic Hypereutectic<br />
L<br />
+<br />
Liquid<br />
L<br />
+<br />
Austénite Graphite<br />
Austenite + Graphite<br />
Ferrite e te + GGraphite ap te<br />
20 °C Ceq %<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
Fe – C Phase diagram (stable)<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011<br />
Eutectic Po<strong>in</strong>t
A<br />
Liquid<br />
<strong>Ductile</strong> <strong>Iron</strong> metallurgy: Hypereutectic mode<br />
Austenite<br />
+<br />
graphite<br />
1150°C<br />
Temp °c<br />
1150 °C<br />
L<br />
+<br />
Austénite<br />
D Austenite + Graphite<br />
Temp °C<br />
B, C<br />
A<br />
723 °C<br />
20 °C<br />
D<br />
3<br />
Ferrite + Graphite<br />
4<br />
B<br />
L<br />
+<br />
Graphite<br />
C<br />
5<br />
Ceq %<br />
<br />
T + dT<br />
timeDIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011<br />
Formation <strong>of</strong><br />
nuclei <strong>of</strong> primary<br />
graphite<br />
Grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> primary<br />
graphite <strong>in</strong> the<br />
liquid<br />
Formation Eutectic<br />
Austenite coated<br />
Graphite<br />
Progression <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Eutectic<br />
solidification<br />
& growth <strong>of</strong> graphite<br />
nodules
<strong>Shr<strong>in</strong>kage</strong> formation versus solidification<br />
Tempe rature<br />
LL+AA Liquid (L)<br />
L+ B<br />
Temp °C<br />
A+B Solidification <strong>of</strong><br />
compound A+B<br />
100% A 100% B<br />
% B <strong>in</strong> A<br />
Fe – C Phase diagram (stable)<br />
Liquid cool<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Typical <strong>Ductile</strong> <strong>Iron</strong> Thermal<br />
Analysis y curve<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011<br />
Formation and grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>of</strong> B <strong>in</strong> the Liquid<br />
Solid cool<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Time
3<br />
Courtesy R. Hummer<br />
Cool<strong>in</strong>g and dilatation curves<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0.2‐0.5 mm<br />
Temp °C<br />
1150°C 1150 C<br />
1 2 3<br />
20mm<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011<br />
5 mm<br />
time
<strong>Micro</strong> shr<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
“La” La mechanisms to elim<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>Micro</strong> <strong>Shr<strong>in</strong>kage</strong><br />
• These works have been done <strong>in</strong> collaboration <strong>with</strong>:<br />
IRC University <strong>of</strong> Birm<strong>in</strong>gham (United K<strong>in</strong>gdom)<br />
R A Hard<strong>in</strong>g Hard<strong>in</strong>g, J Campbell<br />
Pech<strong>in</strong>ey’s Pech<strong>in</strong>ey s Research Central Laboratory (France)<br />
T Margaria<br />
&<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
Lanthanum effect is well known…<br />
• History:<br />
- US Patent 2.970.902 – Alexander & Spengler – 1956<br />
- Improved mach<strong>in</strong>ability<br />
- EP Patent 4819 – Gorger<strong>in</strong>o - 1978<br />
- FR Patent 024855 – 1979<br />
- La efficient element to counter <strong>Micro</strong> <strong>Shr<strong>in</strong>kage</strong><br />
“La” bear<strong>in</strong>g g MgFeSi g : In-Mold process p = success<br />
• “La” bear<strong>in</strong>g MgFeSi : Ladle process = low repeatability due<br />
to the difficulty <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dustrial environment <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
the adequate and repeatable amount <strong>of</strong> La content <strong>in</strong> order<br />
to exercise on the molten metal the desired effects. Rapid<br />
fade as La fades quicker q than Mg g <strong>in</strong> molten iron.<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
Stages g <strong>of</strong> Solidification<br />
• Columnar Solidification<br />
– First solids appear on the mold walls, walls<br />
near locations <strong>of</strong> severe heat loss.<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong>s grow <strong>in</strong> the opposite direction <strong>of</strong><br />
hheat t flow, fl usually ll perpendicular di l to t the th<br />
mold walls.<br />
• Equiaxed Solidification<br />
– After heat flow through the walls is<br />
reduced, particles <strong>of</strong> the columnar<br />
gra<strong>in</strong>s detach and grow freely <strong>in</strong> the<br />
liquid. “Equally” on every “axis”.
Solidification mode:<br />
• Stages <strong>of</strong> solidification <strong>in</strong> a mold<br />
– Columnar, perpendicular to mold walls, opposite to the direction <strong>of</strong> heat flow.<br />
– Equiaxed, When the heat flow reduced, particles from columnar zone detach and<br />
grow freely.<br />
Columnar zone Equiaxe solidification<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
Solidification mode: Influenc<strong>in</strong>g factors<br />
Influenc<strong>in</strong>g factors:<br />
High nucleation favors the Equiaxe mode by<br />
develop<strong>in</strong>g more solidification sites <strong>in</strong> the liquid.<br />
Stirr<strong>in</strong>g motions favors the Equiaxe mode<br />
Other phenomena affect the transition between the<br />
columnar to Equiaxe mode<br />
heat flow<br />
nature nature <strong>of</strong> solute elements at the solidification <strong>in</strong>terface<br />
(segregation , …)<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
Experiments<br />
• Pr<strong>in</strong>ciple<br />
– Measurements <strong>of</strong> the columnar zone thickness at<br />
given solidification times & “La” addition rates, to<br />
demonstrate the effect <strong>of</strong> “La” on an iron<br />
solidification growth process.<br />
– 0.15% addition <strong>of</strong> a late stream <strong>in</strong>oculant.<br />
– La amount <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>oculant varied from 0% to 2,4%.<br />
– <strong>Treatment</strong>s are poured at the same temperature<br />
<strong>in</strong>to a mold.<br />
– At a given g time and targeted g 50% liquid/solid q ratio<br />
the molds are emptied <strong>of</strong> their rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g semi<br />
solid iron.<br />
– The solidified iron shell thickness was measured. measured<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
Experimental procedure<br />
Melt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>FeSiLa</strong><br />
<strong>Treatment</strong> and pour<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the mold Solidification<br />
Thickness<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011<br />
Empty<strong>in</strong>g
Experimental p pprocedure:<br />
Results<br />
• On 60 mm diameter molds (IRC):<br />
% La <strong>in</strong> <strong>Inoculant</strong> Thickness<br />
0% 6 mm<br />
0,8% 2 mm<br />
24% 2,4% 05mm 0,5 mm<br />
On On 100 mm diameter molds (LCR):<br />
% La <strong>in</strong> <strong>Inoculant</strong> Thickness<br />
0% 8mm 8 mm<br />
0,8% 2 mm<br />
2,4% 1,1 mm<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
Experimental procedure: Results<br />
Without La 0%<br />
Diameter 60 mm<br />
Thickness 6 mm<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
Experimental procedure: Results<br />
With La 0.8%<br />
Diameter 60 mm<br />
Thickness 2 mm<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
Experimental p pprocedure:<br />
Results<br />
Without La 0%<br />
With La 0.8%<br />
Diameter 60 mm Diameter 60 mm<br />
Thickness 6 mm Thickness 2 mm<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
Lanthanum effect on solidification<br />
• Lanthanum promotes p the equiaxe q<br />
solidification mode by:<br />
Develop<strong>in</strong>g p g a higher g nucleation power, p , therefore more<br />
solidification sites are <strong>with</strong><strong>in</strong> the molten iron.<br />
Modify<strong>in</strong>g the molten iron viscosity viscosity, favor<strong>in</strong>g stirr<strong>in</strong>g motions<br />
<strong>with</strong><strong>in</strong> the molten iron.<br />
Restrict<strong>in</strong>g the growth <strong>of</strong> columnar gra<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
Consequences q for <strong>Micro</strong> <strong>Shr<strong>in</strong>kage</strong> g<br />
• At a given solidification stage, when “La” is added, the equiaxe<br />
solidification is favored:<br />
– Thickness <strong>of</strong> the columnar zone is reduced: a larger volume <strong>of</strong><br />
free flow<strong>in</strong>g liquid is created allow<strong>in</strong>g molten iron to travel<br />
<strong>with</strong><strong>in</strong> channels thus aid<strong>in</strong>g the feed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the cast<strong>in</strong>g. cast<strong>in</strong>g<br />
– Semi-solid iron conta<strong>in</strong>s more solid particles after fill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a<br />
given volume chamber : less liquid is needed to compensate<br />
the solidification contraction.<br />
– PPromotion i <strong>of</strong> f Late eutectic i graphite hi precipitation. i i i<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
Industrial examples: Crankshafts<br />
Without La<br />
With La<br />
• Th The use <strong>of</strong> f <strong>FeSiLa</strong> F SiL allow: ll <strong>Micro</strong>structure Mi t t – CCast<strong>in</strong>gs ti per mold ld<br />
Courtesy Française de Mécanique<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
US Trials, The Cast<strong>in</strong>g<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
The Cast<strong>in</strong>g<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
The Problem<br />
• An 11 pound crankshaft adapter.<br />
• Orig<strong>in</strong>ally ran >10% for shr<strong>in</strong>kage. shr<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
• Gat<strong>in</strong>g changes brought shr<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
down to about 3% at level 3. 3<br />
• Inoculation practice, 5 pounds per<br />
tton <strong>of</strong> f 75% FFoundry d GGrade d<br />
Ferrosilicon.<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
The Solution<br />
• Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> current gat<strong>in</strong>g system.<br />
• Remove 5 pounds per ton <strong>of</strong> 75% Foundry<br />
Grade Ferrosilicon <strong>in</strong>oculant.<br />
• Add 5 pounds per ton <strong>of</strong> <strong>FeSiLa</strong> <strong>in</strong>oculant.<br />
– Silicon 45 to 50%<br />
– Calcium 1.50 to 2.50 %<br />
– Alum<strong>in</strong>um 1.25% maximum<br />
– Lanthanum 1.80 to 2.20%<br />
– This is a 0.005% 0 005% La addition addition.<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
The First Test<br />
Tightened acceptable shr<strong>in</strong>kage from level 3<br />
down to level 2.<br />
Ran 138 pieces <strong>with</strong> <strong>FeSiLa</strong> alloy <strong>in</strong>oculant. <strong>in</strong>oculant<br />
The 138 pieces were captured and placed <strong>in</strong>to 1<br />
b<strong>in</strong>.<br />
Ran 333 pieces <strong>with</strong> Foundry Grade <strong>in</strong>oculant.<br />
The 333 pieces were captured and placed <strong>in</strong>to 2<br />
bi b<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
122 pieces <strong>in</strong> b<strong>in</strong> # 2.<br />
211 pieces <strong>in</strong> b<strong>in</strong> # 3.<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
The Results<br />
B<strong>in</strong> # 1, <strong>with</strong> <strong>FeSiLa</strong> <strong>in</strong>oculant ran shr<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
ffree <strong>with</strong> i h 138 out <strong>of</strong> f 138 pieces i show<strong>in</strong>g h i no llevel l<br />
<strong>of</strong> shr<strong>in</strong>kage.<br />
B<strong>in</strong> #2, <strong>with</strong> Foundry Grade FeSi <strong>in</strong>oculant.<br />
122 total pieces, 10 pieces <strong>with</strong> shr<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
4 pieces level 2, accepted<br />
6 pieces level 3 or higher, rejected<br />
B<strong>in</strong> # 3, <strong>with</strong> Foundry Grade FeSi <strong>in</strong>oculant.<br />
211 total pieces, 10 pieces <strong>with</strong> shr<strong>in</strong>kage<br />
4 pieces level 2 or less, accepted<br />
6 pieces level 3 or higher, rejected.<br />
12 pieces scrapped from 333 pieces <strong>in</strong> B<strong>in</strong>s #2<br />
and 3 for a scrap rate <strong>of</strong> 3.60%.<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
First Test Test, B<strong>in</strong> Results<br />
138<br />
0<br />
0<br />
211<br />
122 Pieces<br />
10 10<br />
6 6<br />
B<strong>in</strong> 1 <strong>FeSiLa</strong> B<strong>in</strong> 2 FeSi B<strong>in</strong> 3 FeSi<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011<br />
Shr<strong>in</strong>k, Total<br />
Shr<strong>in</strong>k Shr<strong>in</strong>k, Rejectable
9<br />
8<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
First test, shr<strong>in</strong>kage g<br />
breakdown<br />
0 0<br />
8.2<br />
4.92<br />
B<strong>in</strong> 1 <strong>FeSiLa</strong> B<strong>in</strong> 2 FeSi B<strong>in</strong> 3 FeSi<br />
4.74<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011<br />
2.84<br />
% Shr<strong>in</strong>k<br />
% Reject
The Mistake<br />
• The foundry mistakenly reverted back<br />
to the orig<strong>in</strong>al practice, practice mak<strong>in</strong>g anther<br />
1,455 pieces, 6 b<strong>in</strong>s, <strong>with</strong>out the <strong>FeSiLa</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>oculant.<br />
• The choice was to either scrap the<br />
entire run, or 100% <strong>in</strong>spect by x-ray<br />
sort sort. They decided to 100% <strong>in</strong>spect. <strong>in</strong>spect<br />
• Of the 1,455 pieces, 37 were rejected<br />
and 1,419 , were acceptable p for a 2.54%<br />
scrap rate.<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
The Results from the<br />
Mistake<br />
• All b<strong>in</strong>s had Foundry Grade 75% FeSi <strong>in</strong>oculant.<br />
– B<strong>in</strong> # 1 had 231 pieces.<br />
• 5 pieces <strong>with</strong> level 3 shr<strong>in</strong>kage, rejected.<br />
– B<strong>in</strong> # 2 had 234 pieces.<br />
• 10 pieces <strong>with</strong> level 3 or higher shr<strong>in</strong>kage, rejected.<br />
– B<strong>in</strong> # 3 had 271 pieces.<br />
• 3 pieces <strong>with</strong> level 3 shr<strong>in</strong>kage, rejected.<br />
– Bi B<strong>in</strong> # #4h 4 had d259 259 pieces. i<br />
• 6 pieces <strong>with</strong> level 3 shr<strong>in</strong>kage, rejected.<br />
– B<strong>in</strong> # 5 had 263 pieces.<br />
• 10 pieces <strong>with</strong> level 3 shr<strong>in</strong>kage, shr<strong>in</strong>kage rejected rejected.<br />
– B<strong>in</strong> # 6 had 197 pieces.<br />
• 3 pieces had level 3 shr<strong>in</strong>kage, rejected.<br />
– Overall scrap rate 22.54% 54%<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
Second Run, B<strong>in</strong> Results<br />
231<br />
5<br />
234<br />
10<br />
271<br />
259<br />
3 6<br />
263<br />
197<br />
B<strong>in</strong> 1 FeSi B<strong>in</strong> 2 FeSi B<strong>in</strong> 3 FeSi B<strong>in</strong> 4 FeSi B<strong>in</strong> 5 FeSi B<strong>in</strong> 6 FeSi<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011<br />
10<br />
3<br />
Pieces<br />
Shr<strong>in</strong>k, Total<br />
Shr<strong>in</strong>k, Rejectable
Second Run, <strong>Shr<strong>in</strong>kage</strong><br />
4.5 4.27<br />
4<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
11<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
2.16<br />
Results<br />
1.11<br />
B<strong>in</strong> 1 FeSi B<strong>in</strong> 2 FeSi B<strong>in</strong> 3 FeSi B<strong>in</strong> 4 FeSi B<strong>in</strong> 5 FeSi B<strong>in</strong> 6 FeSi<br />
2.32<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011<br />
3.8<br />
1.52<br />
% Shr<strong>in</strong>k<br />
% Reject
The End<strong>in</strong>g<br />
The The foundry did not conduct another “Trial Trial<br />
<strong>with</strong> the <strong>FeSiLa</strong> <strong>in</strong>oculant” due to the cost<br />
<strong>of</strong> 100% x-ray <strong>in</strong>spection <strong>of</strong> the 1,455<br />
pieces pieces.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce that time, the foundry has shipped<br />
over 9,000 pieces to their customer while<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g i the th <strong>FeSiLa</strong> F SiL <strong>in</strong>oculant. i l t<br />
The foundry has not had a s<strong>in</strong>gle compla<strong>in</strong>t<br />
for porosity p y s<strong>in</strong>ce the implementation p<br />
<strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>FeSiLa</strong> <strong>in</strong>oculant as standard practice for<br />
this part.<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
Thank You<br />
• The presenter would like to<br />
acknowledge and thank:<br />
– R Siclari, T Margaria, E Bethelet and J<br />
Fourmann for their paper p p titled “<strong>Micro</strong>-<br />
shr<strong>in</strong>kage <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ductile</strong> <strong>Iron</strong> / Mechanism &<br />
Solution” which was orig<strong>in</strong>ally<br />
presented at the 2003 Keith Millis<br />
Symposium on <strong>Ductile</strong> Cast <strong>Iron</strong>.<br />
– Jim Csonka, Hickman, Williams &<br />
Company for the technical assistance <strong>in</strong><br />
prepar<strong>in</strong>g this presentation.<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011
Questions?<br />
DIS DIS Annual Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g, Meet<strong>in</strong>g, June June 2, 2, 2011 2011