29.03.2013 Views

Notice of Hearing on the Application to Use Sodium Fluoroacetate ...

Notice of Hearing on the Application to Use Sodium Fluoroacetate ...

Notice of Hearing on the Application to Use Sodium Fluoroacetate ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> ma; a1;housn unknc~n csus2s cf sne?? and 7259 ~ P ~ Y S<br />

arn~uric2d <strong>to</strong> 18 ?ercenc o i all losses in, 1367, ~nkncwn C ~ L I S ~ <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S<br />

deachs were <strong>on</strong>ly 7 ?ercent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all losses in i973.<br />

23, A1 though <strong>the</strong> loss figures reported by Mr. ,Vurfield included lambs<br />

born during <strong>the</strong> year which were lost <strong>to</strong> preda<strong>to</strong>rs, <strong>the</strong> loss rates<br />

wer2 not calculated by zdding <strong>the</strong> 1,amb crop - for <strong>the</strong> year in questi<strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> inven<strong>to</strong>ry as <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> January 1. Hr. Nurfiela befmded rhis<br />

result, rejecting <strong>the</strong> idea that ;he lamb crop during <strong>the</strong> year should<br />

be added <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> January 1 inven<strong>to</strong>ry in order <strong>to</strong> calculate <strong>the</strong><br />

percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> predati<strong>on</strong> loss25, because, int:r alia, <strong>the</strong> invenxory<br />

as o-i January 1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> eSch year i nc1 uded 1 ambsm born si nce Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 1<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> preceding year and add'ng <strong>the</strong> lamb crop would resulc in<br />

dup1.icati<strong>on</strong>. It appears, h~we\/er, that lamb crcp for each year as<br />

reported by SRS includes lambs born frcm Oc<strong>to</strong>ber l <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> gr2~2ding<br />

year thrcugh Seg<strong>to</strong>mber 30 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> che succeeding year. Accordingly, ;he<br />

dupl icati<strong>on</strong> referred ta by Nr. Murfield does not appear <strong>to</strong> be real .<br />

A table produc2d by Defenders reflects <strong>the</strong> percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sheep and<br />

lamb losszs co a17 causes in Texas as a percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> January 1<br />

inven<strong>to</strong>ry plus <strong>the</strong> lamb crop for each year from 1962 and including<br />

1981 as reported by <strong>the</strong> SRS and <strong>the</strong> Crop Reporting Board <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong><br />

U.S. Departnent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Agriculture. The table reflects that car~bined<br />

losses <strong>to</strong> all causes were 10.4 percent in ,1960, 9.7 percent in 1967,<br />

7.3 percent in 1974 and 6.6 percent in 1981. This table is in accord

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!