Notice of Hearing on the Application to Use Sodium Fluoroacetate ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

chagses caus~d ~OSS~S. ! - 3y ;qcreaj~d supply. T+e 2ifsc: !s to 3vorszats C C % ~ ' 35. Whether an increase in supply <strong>of</strong> shes? and lamb would in fact rzsult in a decrease in price depends on ~he s2nsicivify <strong>of</strong> price to the quantity sold, which is "Le.med price flexi bil i ty or price e:astici ty ef demand. "Price flexibility" is che percent.age change in price ;.rhich will resulc from a one perccnt change in the quanticy cffered for L sale, wni 12 "el astici ty <strong>of</strong> dernand" i s bhz eercentage change in q1 ~nci ty - 1 purchased that resul ti: frcm a on2 percznt change in price. I nere i s evidence that :he dernand for lamb is inelastic and thac in view <strong>of</strong> the fact that only a minbrity <strong>of</strong> producers suffer gredation loss2s,
A 1 percznt reduction in l~sszs to j .3 1;iircenLL l,~o~;d incre5s~ lamb product-ion by 53,500 head and gross revenue TO producers by $1 .3 mi 11 ion. A 2 perc2nt r~duction in coyote predation 1 osses to 4.: percent would increase lamb production by i07,lGO head and grms r2venue to she?? producnrs by 32.7 million. ?educing lamo losses t~ 3.5 percent would increase prcductign by 160,550 nead and in grcss income co U.S. sheep producsrs by SJ. 1 mi1 i ion. A furlher r2duc;ion to 1.5 percznt would increase lamb produc~ion by 267,750 head and gross income tc prcdQc2rs by 56.3 mi 1 l ian. A 1 p2rcent reduc;~ gn in average coyote pr2dation frcm 6.5 percenT to 5.5 ?ercsnt Is in excgss <strong>of</strong> 15 percenx dnd a rnduction in coyotz predation from 6.5 percent to 1.3 perc~nt would be a rzduction <strong>of</strong> approximately 77 percefle. I"Lis clear Ehac reqistratior; ~f Z~m~ounC 10BC :vjl' not el irninate a1 1 predation and there is no evidence frcm hnich i t could be concluded 'hat reducxions <strong>of</strong> suc~ magnitude are likely from the reregi strat'on cf Compound 108C. :iloreover, siich rgductions in coyote predation wculd hardly be costless and such cost should be deductsd i n cons i aeri ng overall benef i ts . 37. Using budgets prepared by the Cccperative Extznsion Servicz <strong>of</strong> Colorado State University, estimates have been made <strong>of</strong> the impacts on individual producers <strong>of</strong> reductions in lamb losses to coyotes for prcduc2rs having 50G, 2,000 2nd 2,100 head <strong>of</strong> sheep, These calcuiations indicate chat ror tne 536 snee+ oper*at:uri hcivlng C! reauction in lam^ iosses
Page 1 and 2: -0 UEl iTE3 STATES €ti'/ i?O!iPii
Page 3 and 4: - of the sus9ensi;
Page 5 and 6: % 5 Ir.imalz, Inc.; the United St3t
Page 7 and 8: 4. Lamb Izsszs r2p0r224 k;/ Sae, zt
Page 9 and 10: ?rodatisn >/el 1 4ncwn i3 enchers.
Page 11 and 12: spor~od i~si2~ exceeciln~ 10 7erz2n
Page 13 and 14: A ~~;c-lt '.". tg L;--~-
Page 15 and 16: , - attempt to Pass under cr t'ircu
Page 17 and 18: , 17 A' ~nat ihere is 2 41 reciz re
Page 19 and 20: . - indicating er~?ctivzness <stron
Page 21 and 22: - 3C. ix7ei-t tstiiccny from witnes
Page 23: have been ?srima-- ", dc $13 zii 1
Page 27 and 28: 4 . on his hancs and xhen S n w 3:s
Page 29 and 30: 2 3 i I 43. ~ ~ Y S ~ 3f J - I Soor
Page 31 and 32: :A :- of these ~~C
Page 33 and 34: I, 3 3 obcained iron fire coycces,
Page 35 and 36: . 7 hi~her 1G60 resiaups :ban :vera
Page 37 and 38: ". 3 7 insoluble in organic solvent
Page 39 and 40: I 3 9 dr? 3n eii?t~ive 72rnad <stro
Page 41 and 42: 4 1 "i have increased rir,co 1972,
Page 43 and 44: I ilpon :uhich tk 1972 order m i 5a
Page 45 and 46: ?ffzctiveness of C
Page 47 and 48: ?roved. The lin~xed use of<
Page 49: - granted . Oated rhis 22nd day <st
Page 52 and 53: ' th respect to a? 1 a? ternati ves
Page 55 and 56: 1. a Przdaci on Loss Rates A. Sheep
Page 57 and 58: i , The Ca: n Cornmi i ~ee, her2ina
Page 59 and 60: including those to predators. Resul
Page 61 and 62: - - 1 1-- , crp?::er :>rn rne .v?cz
Page 63 and 64: . .1
Page 65 and 66: ". -. ;:;ares ire frcn Gee, 2; 2 ]
Page 67 and 68: 3 percen: in 1073 and 1975. 21s aay
Page 69 and 70: ;4r, iaryy 3g~rr?~, 3f T ~ ~ I C -
Page 71 and 72: c3yo12s lere 25.8 perceni o
Page 73 and 74: sheep flocks in Utah. Tile study (t
Page 75 and 76:
predaiors anounted to 25 3erceni <s
Page 77 and 78:
lost 102,800 animals (sheep and lam
Page 79 and 80:
9egartxct's Animal lanacjo Cm~roi S
Page 81 and 82:
i , Adji~s~d ;ant lasszs were 7 2er
Page 83 and 84:
, , znd notzd that sne icss rat2 de
Page 86 and 87:
educ~i zn i n 1 osses ir;iii~di 3 0
Page 88 and 89:
7 Arizcna, Idaho and 12xas. He %st'
Page 90 and 91:
- I , r ;I ' , 2rrtj d Snyder, a '.
Page 92 and 93:
in 7 381 . 3ecausz hs did no: have
Page 94 and 95:
is frc~ -1 coyotas. - I nz TCI,T~:C
Page 96 and 97:
535 lambs lcst to all causes ii7 I%
Page 98 and 99:
0 '.- 01 I-! Q I-' -0 fu I-) a x -I
Page 100 and 101:
52. +lr. Bartcn +i,artza, 3iy3ctcr
Page 102 and 103:
of tne herd. Mr. B
Page 105 and 106:
. ~! pastur2s and zdjaining areas.
Page 107 and 108:
Cdf""- La~~2s - -. 3r 71~2 ?cisaced
Page 109 and 110:
n 0 --I --1 P, 7 CD a cL) 0 a' r+ L
Page 111 and 112:
9 four in /*lay, ihr~n in dune, TNO
Page 113 and 114:
. or killed in targec ?astures. ~ 7
Page 115 and 116:
zttacks cn collared animals was inh
Page 117 and 118:
u I , S trychn: ne (;as cans i i or
Page 119 and 120:
Envi ranrnenr 3ersonnel in accordan
Page 121 and 122:
, ;~fiy-sji -. ccyoies >dere caken
Page 123 and 124:
521 ectivi zy cf silch h i ',< to c
Page 125 and 126:
study of the ;arz-
Page 127 and 128:
, 7 1 ,,di n j - 2 ~ 1944-.L5, ~ 19
Page 129 and 130:
in cnz iac.:?r thr2o pars ,\ere 13,
Page 131 and 132:
an error. 1C2. Mr. Noman i. Johnson
Page 133 and 134:
52ing inaceouaie fo c~n:ro? ;oyo;e
Page 135 and 136:
1 . ?rocjrarn for the 2yonlng 2e$ar
Page 137 and 138:
8 I (C2Cs: and J:/ zl/alliaz?cg or
Page 139 and 140:
cI~s? s=gezr.er 2s ryui a :iazs a l
Page 141 and 142:
,Vai-mai i m srzdzfsrs .rers ~emove
Page 143 and 144:
& - 122, sxay ;uhicn ?;la-i <strong
Page 145 and 146:
the socjzl or;.zni zati33, azc!~ hj
Page 147 and 148:
. e coyotss for one r?aszn or anoc5
Page 149 and 150:
. -- hiding pl aczs and :.+us rlncs
Page 151 and 152:
In 1975, 6.3 prc2n: 2r' C:;ICXS :-s
Page 153 and 154:
8 . carcasses of s
Page 155 and 156:
El 1 ins , a 2€s?arch ?sychci cgi
Page 157 and 158:
in aversive cond:xic~ing and :ne ne
Page 159 and 160:
-- \ 9t-cmijz in reducing jheep :cs
Page 161 and 162:
1 135 zonths cf 2 ~ 2nd 2 has r~~73
Page 163 and 164:
Shee? Z~$eri~enc Stasion, Zu~cis, I
Page 165 and 166:
es4;ina%d ancuai food costs ar appr
Page 167 and 168:
c~paci ty 32r~t :zi n? ge >:a; 12 1
Page 169 and 170:
3 3ni 27 IZK~VS s2zj~n5 -,,- - - -
Page 171 and 172:
lasz 40 years, frcm a h?gh
Page 173 and 174:
of enfrgy in reien
Page 175 and 176:
sheep shoilced a. ne? rr-xrn <stron
Page 177 and 178:
12 sercspx in 1973, :ne year ' ~ i
Page 179 and 180:
1 shoulc . . oe of
Page 181 and 182:
- - . .. 7-- - .. I v 2. ;r. ?wer s
Page 183 and 184:
that reduciflg coyoc2 gr?d?z~on ~QS
Page 185 and 186:
I C r ?-. ~co, i 29 ic 52,gGC. F.7
Page 187 and 188:
. . croductian ass~r~edlj Sue ~2 pe
Page 189 and 190:
cr,crns. Jo 2v:zerrce cf silcn ?ur;
Page 191 and 192:
, r,no,rz z-Q?~ 53 352 '32; ~5 7 y
Page 193 and 194:
-. ;usper.sizn of
Page 195 and 196:
in vials of 0.3 g
Page 197 and 198:
1080 residues were found in a sampl
Page 199 and 200:
32gl2 r3c3verea ? n 3bcu'l six ia:/
Page 201 and 202:
- iil rjssues of c
Page 203 and 204:
1 Senior IOX~ cciog- ST =1)r 722 '4
Page 205 and 206:
.i 1 L9 co~c2ntra:i~ns of</
Page 207 and 208:
.*. . fr?m a goac, sp; i !I ng ;he
Page 209 and 210:
1 133 . , r . Randall .as cre <stro
Page 211 and 212:
-.ccn~roi , ';?izncers nave shown a
Page 213:
and cold-weazner xonths. Se indjcat
Page 217 and 218:
0 -5 i-i .n 5 5 5. 0 x < fi < J --'
Page 219 and 220:
-. 7 %its jhail be pro?arzd, sold o
show all

Notice of Hearing on the Application to Use Sodium Fluoroacetate ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?