29.03.2013 Views

Optimal Control of Partial Differential Equations

Optimal Control of Partial Differential Equations

Optimal Control of Partial Differential Equations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 9<br />

<strong>Control</strong> <strong>of</strong> a semilinear parabolic<br />

equation<br />

9.1 Introduction<br />

In this chapter we study control problems for a semilinear parabolic equation <strong>of</strong> Burgers’ type<br />

in dimension 2. For a L 2 -distributed control, we prove the existence <strong>of</strong> a unique solution to the<br />

state equation in C([0, T ]; L 2 (Ω)) ∩ L 2 (0, T ; H 1 0(Ω)). Following the approach <strong>of</strong> the previous<br />

chapters we use the semigroup theory. We first prove the existence <strong>of</strong> a local solution for<br />

initial data in L 2p (Ω) for p > 2, and next the existence <strong>of</strong> a global solution by establishing<br />

an energy estimate. The existence <strong>of</strong> a (uinque) solution for L 2 -initial data is obtained by<br />

approximation. The classical method to study this kind <strong>of</strong> equation is the variational method<br />

(also called the Faedo-Galerkin method). This approach is treated in exercise 9.7.2. This<br />

chapter can be considered as an introduction to the optimal control <strong>of</strong> the Navier-Stokes<br />

equations [27]. Indeed the pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> optimality conditions is very similar in both cases.<br />

To study the state equation and the control problem, we need additional regularity results<br />

on parabolic equations. These results are stated in Appendix (section 9.6).<br />

9.2 Distributed control<br />

Let Ω be a bounded domain in R 2 , with a regular boundary Γ. Let T > 0, set Q = Ω × (0, T )<br />

and Σ = Γ × (0, T ). We consider the equation<br />

∂z<br />

∂t − ∆z + Φ(z) = f + χωu in Q, z = 0 on Σ, z(x, 0) = z0 in Ω, (9.2.1)<br />

with f ∈ L2 (Q), u ∈ L2 (0, T ; L2 (ω)), z0 ∈ L2 (Ω). The function f is a given source term,<br />

χω is the characteristic function <strong>of</strong> ω, ω is an open subset <strong>of</strong> Ω, and the function u is a<br />

control variable. The nonlinear term φ is defined by φ(z) = 2z∂x1z = ∂x1(z 2 ). Any other<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> first order partial derivatives may be considered, for example we can as well<br />

consider φ(z) = Σ 2 i=1z∂xi<br />

z. We first want to prove the existence <strong>of</strong> a unique weak solution (in a<br />

sense to be precised) to equation (9.2.1). Recall that, if z0 ∈ L 2 (Ω) and g ∈ L 2 (0, T ; H −1 (Ω)),<br />

equation<br />

∂z<br />

∂t − ∆z = g in Q, z = 0 on Σ, z(x, 0) = z0 in Ω, (9.2.2)<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!