Optimal Control of Partial Differential Equations
Optimal Control of Partial Differential Equations Optimal Control of Partial Differential Equations
68 CHAPTER 6. CONTROL OF THE WAVE EQUATION Let us establish the optimality conditions for (P2). As usual we set F2(u) = J2(z(u), u), where z(u) is the solution to (6.3.6). We have F ′ 2(ū2)u = Ω (∇¯z2(T ) − ∇zd(T ))∇wu(T ) + β Q χωū2u, where wu is the solution to Since ∂2w ∂t2 − ∆w = χωu in Q, w = 0 on Σ, w(x, 0) = 0 and ∂w (x, 0) = 0 in Ω. ∂t (∇¯z2(T ) − ∇zd(T ))∇wu(T ) = 〈−∆(¯z2(T ) − zd(T )), wu(T )〉 H−1 (Ω)×H1 0 (Ω), Ω applying formula (6.2.3) to p2 and wu, we obtain F ′ 2(ū2)u = (χω(βū2 + p2)u = 0 Q for every u ∈ L 2 (0, T ; L 2 (ω)). Thus the optimality condition for (P2) is proved. The proof of the other results is left to the reader. Comments. As for the heat equation with distributed controls, equation (6.3.6) is of the form y ′ = Ay + F + Bu, y(0) = y0, with Ay = A y1 y2 = y2 ∆y1 0 , F = f z0 , y0 = z1 0 , and Bu = χωu Thus problem (P1) is a particular case of control problems studied in Chapter 7. 6.4 Neumann boundary control We first study the equation ∂2z − ∆z = f in Q, ∂t2 ∂z ∂n = 0 on Σ, z(x, 0) = z0 and ∂z ∂t (x, 0) = z1 in Ω. (6.4.10) We set D(A) = {y1 ∈ H 2 (Ω) | ∂y1 ∂n = 0} × H1 (Ω), Y = H 1 (Ω) × L 2 (Ω), and Ay = A y1 y2 y2 = ∆y1 − y1 , Ly = Equation (6.4.10) may be written in the form dy dt 0 y1 , F = = (A + L)y + F, y(0) = y0. 0 f , and y0 = Theorem 6.4.1 The operator (A, D(A)) is the infinitesimal generator of a strongly continuous semigroup of contractions on Y . Proof. We leave the reader adapt the proof of Theorem 6.2.1. z0 z1 . .
6.4. NEUMANN BOUNDARY CONTROL 69 Theorem 6.4.2 For every f ∈ L 2 (Q), every z0 ∈ H 1 (Ω), every z1 ∈ L 2 (Ω), equation (6.4.10) admits a unique weak solution z(f, z0, z1), moreover the operator (f, z0, z1) ↦→ z(f, z0, z1) is linear and continuous from L 2 (Q)×H 1 (Ω)×L 2 (Ω) into C([0, T ]; H 1 (Ω))∩C 1 ([0, T ]; L 2 (Ω)). To study the wave equation with nonhomogeneous boundary conditions, we set D( A) = H1 (Ω) × L2 (Ω), Y = L2 (Ω) × (H1 (Ω)) ′ , and Ay = y1 y2 A = , y2 Ãy1 − y1 where Ãy1, ζ (H1 (Ω)) ′ = − ∇y1 · ∇(−∆ + I) Ω −1 ζ. Theorem 6.4.3 The operator ( A, D( A)) is the infinitesimal generator of a semigroup of contractions on Y . Proof. The proof is similar to the one of Theorem 6.2.3. Now, we consider the wave equation with a control in a Neumann boundary condition: ∂2z ∂z − ∆z = f in Q, ∂t2 ∂n = u on Σ, z(x, 0) = z0 and ∂z ∂t (x, 0) = z1 in Ω. (6.4.11) For any u ∈ L2 (Γ), the mapping ζ ↦→ Γ uζ is a continuous linear on H1 (Ω). Thus it can be identified with an element of (H1 (Ω)) ′ . Thus for u ∈ L2 (Σ), the mapping ζ ↦→ u(·)ζ is an element of L2 (0, T ; (H1 (Ω)) ′ ). Let us denote this mapping by û. We set y1 0 V = 0 û , F = 0 f , L Equation (6.4.11) may be written in the form y2 = y1 dy dt = ( A + L)y + F + V, y(0) = y0, , and y0 = z0 with F and V belong to L 2 (0, T ; L 2 (Ω)) × L 2 (0, T ; (H 1 (Ω)) ′ ), y0 ∈ L 2 (Ω) × (H 1 (Ω)) ′ . Theorem 6.4.4 For every (f, u, z0, z1) ∈ L 2 (Q)×L 2 (Σ)×L 2 (Ω)×(H 1 (Ω)) ′ , equation (6.4.11) admits a unique weak solution z(f, u, z0, z1) in C([0, T ]; L 2 (Ω))∩C 1 ([0, T ]; (H 1 (Ω)) ′ ). Moreover the mapping (f, u, z0, z1) ↦→ z(f, u, z0, z1) is continuous from L 2 (Q)×L 2 (Σ)×L 2 (Ω)×(H 1 (Ω)) ′ into C([0, T ]; L 2 (Ω)) ∩ C 1 ([0, T ]; (H 1 (Ω)) ′ ). Proof. The result is a direct consequence of Theorem 6.4.3. We consider the control problem (P4) inf{J4(z, u) | (z, u) ∈ C([0, T ]; L 2 (Ω)) × L 2 (0, T ; L 2 (Ω)), (z, u) satisfies (6.4.11)}, with J4(z, u) = 1 (z − zd) 2 Q 2 + 1 (z(T ) − zd(T )) 2 Ω 2 + β u 2 Σ 2 . z1 Γ .
- Page 18 and 19: 18 CHAPTER 2. CONTROL OF ELLIPTIC E
- Page 20 and 21: 20 CHAPTER 2. CONTROL OF ELLIPTIC E
- Page 22 and 23: 22 CHAPTER 2. CONTROL OF ELLIPTIC E
- Page 24 and 25: 24 CHAPTER 2. CONTROL OF ELLIPTIC E
- Page 26 and 27: 26 CHAPTER 2. CONTROL OF ELLIPTIC E
- Page 28 and 29: 28 CHAPTER 3. CONTROL OF SEMILINEAR
- Page 30 and 31: 30 CHAPTER 3. CONTROL OF SEMILINEAR
- Page 32 and 33: 32 CHAPTER 3. CONTROL OF SEMILINEAR
- Page 34 and 35: 34 CHAPTER 3. CONTROL OF SEMILINEAR
- Page 36 and 37: 36 CHAPTER 3. CONTROL OF SEMILINEAR
- Page 38 and 39: 38 CHAPTER 3. CONTROL OF SEMILINEAR
- Page 40 and 41: 40 CHAPTER 3. CONTROL OF SEMILINEAR
- Page 42 and 43: 42 CHAPTER 4. EVOLUTION EQUATIONS 4
- Page 44 and 45: 44 CHAPTER 4. EVOLUTION EQUATIONS w
- Page 46 and 47: 46 CHAPTER 4. EVOLUTION EQUATIONS D
- Page 48 and 49: 48 CHAPTER 5. CONTROL OF THE HEAT E
- Page 50 and 51: 50 CHAPTER 5. CONTROL OF THE HEAT E
- Page 52 and 53: 52 CHAPTER 5. CONTROL OF THE HEAT E
- Page 54 and 55: 54 CHAPTER 5. CONTROL OF THE HEAT E
- Page 56 and 57: 56 CHAPTER 5. CONTROL OF THE HEAT E
- Page 58 and 59: 58 CHAPTER 5. CONTROL OF THE HEAT E
- Page 60 and 61: 60 CHAPTER 5. CONTROL OF THE HEAT E
- Page 62 and 63: 62 CHAPTER 5. CONTROL OF THE HEAT E
- Page 64 and 65: 64 CHAPTER 6. CONTROL OF THE WAVE E
- Page 66 and 67: 66 CHAPTER 6. CONTROL OF THE WAVE E
- Page 70 and 71: 70 CHAPTER 6. CONTROL OF THE WAVE E
- Page 72 and 73: 72 CHAPTER 6. CONTROL OF THE WAVE E
- Page 74 and 75: 74 CHAPTER 6. CONTROL OF THE WAVE E
- Page 76 and 77: 76 CHAPTER 7. EQUATIONS WITH BOUNDE
- Page 78 and 79: 78 CHAPTER 7. EQUATIONS WITH BOUNDE
- Page 80 and 81: 80 CHAPTER 8. EQUATIONS WITH UNBOUN
- Page 82 and 83: 82 CHAPTER 8. EQUATIONS WITH UNBOUN
- Page 84 and 85: 84 CHAPTER 8. EQUATIONS WITH UNBOUN
- Page 86 and 87: 86 CHAPTER 8. EQUATIONS WITH UNBOUN
- Page 88 and 89: 88 CHAPTER 8. EQUATIONS WITH UNBOUN
- Page 90 and 91: 90 CHAPTER 8. EQUATIONS WITH UNBOUN
- Page 92 and 93: 92 CHAPTER 8. EQUATIONS WITH UNBOUN
- Page 94 and 95: 94 CHAPTER 8. EQUATIONS WITH UNBOUN
- Page 96 and 97: 96 CHAPTER 8. EQUATIONS WITH UNBOUN
- Page 98 and 99: 98 CHAPTER 8. EQUATIONS WITH UNBOUN
- Page 100 and 101: 100 CHAPTER 9. CONTROL OF A SEMILIN
- Page 102 and 103: 102 CHAPTER 9. CONTROL OF A SEMILIN
- Page 104 and 105: 104 CHAPTER 9. CONTROL OF A SEMILIN
- Page 106 and 107: 106 CHAPTER 9. CONTROL OF A SEMILIN
- Page 108 and 109: 108 CHAPTER 9. CONTROL OF A SEMILIN
- Page 110 and 111: 110 CHAPTER 10. ALGORITHMS FOR SOLV
- Page 112 and 113: 112 CHAPTER 10. ALGORITHMS FOR SOLV
- Page 114 and 115: 114 CHAPTER 10. ALGORITHMS FOR SOLV
- Page 116 and 117: 116 CHAPTER 10. ALGORITHMS FOR SOLV
6.4. NEUMANN BOUNDARY CONTROL 69<br />
Theorem 6.4.2 For every f ∈ L 2 (Q), every z0 ∈ H 1 (Ω), every z1 ∈ L 2 (Ω), equation (6.4.10)<br />
admits a unique weak solution z(f, z0, z1), moreover the operator<br />
(f, z0, z1) ↦→ z(f, z0, z1)<br />
is linear and continuous from L 2 (Q)×H 1 (Ω)×L 2 (Ω) into C([0, T ]; H 1 (Ω))∩C 1 ([0, T ]; L 2 (Ω)).<br />
To study the wave equation with nonhomogeneous boundary conditions, we set D( A) =<br />
H1 (Ω) × L2 (Ω), Y = L2 (Ω) × (H1 (Ω)) ′ , and<br />
Ay = <br />
y1<br />
y2<br />
A =<br />
,<br />
y2 Ãy1 − y1<br />
where <br />
Ãy1, ζ<br />
(H1 (Ω)) ′<br />
<br />
= − ∇y1 · ∇(−∆ + I)<br />
Ω<br />
−1 ζ.<br />
Theorem 6.4.3 The operator ( A, D( A)) is the infinitesimal generator <strong>of</strong> a semigroup <strong>of</strong> contractions<br />
on Y .<br />
Pro<strong>of</strong>. The pro<strong>of</strong> is similar to the one <strong>of</strong> Theorem 6.2.3.<br />
Now, we consider the wave equation with a control in a Neumann boundary condition:<br />
∂2z ∂z<br />
− ∆z = f in Q,<br />
∂t2 ∂n = u on Σ, z(x, 0) = z0 and ∂z<br />
∂t (x, 0) = z1 in Ω. (6.4.11)<br />
For any u ∈ L2 (Γ), the mapping ζ ↦→ <br />
Γ uζ is a continuous linear on H1 (Ω). Thus it can be<br />
identified with an element <strong>of</strong> (H1 (Ω)) ′ . Thus for u ∈ L2 (Σ), the mapping ζ ↦→ <br />
u(·)ζ is an<br />
element <strong>of</strong> L2 (0, T ; (H1 (Ω)) ′ ). Let us denote this mapping by û. We set<br />
<br />
y1<br />
<br />
0<br />
V =<br />
0<br />
û<br />
<br />
, F =<br />
0<br />
f<br />
<br />
, L<br />
Equation (6.4.11) may be written in the form<br />
y2<br />
=<br />
y1<br />
dy<br />
dt = ( A + L)y + F + V, y(0) = y0,<br />
<br />
, and y0 =<br />
z0<br />
with F and V belong to L 2 (0, T ; L 2 (Ω)) × L 2 (0, T ; (H 1 (Ω)) ′ ), y0 ∈ L 2 (Ω) × (H 1 (Ω)) ′ .<br />
Theorem 6.4.4 For every (f, u, z0, z1) ∈ L 2 (Q)×L 2 (Σ)×L 2 (Ω)×(H 1 (Ω)) ′ , equation (6.4.11)<br />
admits a unique weak solution z(f, u, z0, z1) in C([0, T ]; L 2 (Ω))∩C 1 ([0, T ]; (H 1 (Ω)) ′ ). Moreover<br />
the mapping (f, u, z0, z1) ↦→ z(f, u, z0, z1) is continuous from L 2 (Q)×L 2 (Σ)×L 2 (Ω)×(H 1 (Ω)) ′<br />
into C([0, T ]; L 2 (Ω)) ∩ C 1 ([0, T ]; (H 1 (Ω)) ′ ).<br />
Pro<strong>of</strong>. The result is a direct consequence <strong>of</strong> Theorem 6.4.3.<br />
We consider the control problem<br />
(P4) inf{J4(z, u) | (z, u) ∈ C([0, T ]; L 2 (Ω)) × L 2 (0, T ; L 2 (Ω)), (z, u) satisfies (6.4.11)},<br />
with<br />
J4(z, u) = 1<br />
<br />
(z − zd)<br />
2 Q<br />
2 + 1<br />
<br />
(z(T ) − zd(T ))<br />
2 Ω<br />
2 + β<br />
<br />
u<br />
2 Σ<br />
2 .<br />
z1<br />
Γ<br />
<br />
.