29.03.2013 Views

Optimal Control of Partial Differential Equations

Optimal Control of Partial Differential Equations

Optimal Control of Partial Differential Equations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9.4. EXISTENCE OF A GLOBAL WEAK SOLUTION FOR L 2 -INITILAL DATA 101<br />

9.3.2 Initial data in D((−A) α )<br />

Set D(A) = H2 (Ω) ∩ H1 0(Ω) and Az = ∆z for z ∈ D(A). For 1<br />

2 < α < 1, we have D((−A)α ) =<br />

H2α (Ω) ∩ H1 0(Ω) (see [18]). Suppose that f ∈ L2 (Q), and z0 ∈ D((−A) α ), with 1 < α < 1.<br />

2<br />

As in section 9.3.1, we can prove that equation (9.3.3) admits a unique weak solution in<br />

C([0, ˆt]; D((−A) α )) for ˆt small enough. Since D((−A) α ) ⊂ L2p (Ω) for all p ≤ ∞, this implies<br />

that the solution defined in C([0, ˆt]; D((−A) α )) is the same as the solution defined in section<br />

9.3.1.<br />

9.3.3 Existence <strong>of</strong> a global solution<br />

Suppose that f ∈ L 2 (Q), and z0 ∈ D((−A) α ), with 1<br />

2 < α < 1. Let Tmax be such that<br />

the solution to equation (9.3.3) exists in C([0, τ]; L 2p (Ω)) for all p > 2 and all τ < Tmax. If<br />

Tmax = ∞, we have proved the existence <strong>of</strong> a global solution. Otherwise, we necessarily have<br />

limτ→Tmaxz C([0,τ];L 2p (Ω)) = ∞, (9.3.4)<br />

for some p > 2. Let us show that we have a contradiction. Multiplying the equation by<br />

|z| 2p−2z, and integrating on (0, τ) × Ω, we obtain<br />

<br />

1<br />

2p<br />

|z(τ)| 2p τ <br />

+ (2p − 1)|∇z| 2 |z| 2p−2 = 1<br />

<br />

2p<br />

|z0| 2p τ <br />

+ f|z| 2p−2 z. (9.3.5)<br />

Ω<br />

0<br />

Ω<br />

Indeed, with an integration by parts, we get<br />

<br />

∂x1(z 2 )|z| 2p−2 <br />

2p − 1<br />

z = −<br />

2<br />

Ω<br />

Ω<br />

Ω<br />

0<br />

Ω<br />

|z| 2p−2 z∂x1(z 2 ). (9.3.6)<br />

Thus it yields <br />

|z|<br />

Ω<br />

2p−2 z∂x1(z 2 ) = 0.<br />

Moreover <br />

∇z · ∇(|z|<br />

Ω<br />

2p−2 <br />

z) = (2p − 1)|∇z|<br />

Ω<br />

2 |z| 2p−2 . (9.3.7)<br />

Formula (9.3.5) is established. It is clearly in contradiction with (9.3.4). Observe that calculations<br />

in (9.3.6) and (9.3.7) are justified because z is bounded, and in that case the solution to<br />

(9.3.3) belongs to Lq (0, T ; W 1,q (Ω)) for all q < ∞ (apply Theorem 9.6.3). Therefore formulas<br />

(9.3.6) and (9.3.7) are meaningful. The regularity in C([0, T ]; L2p (Ω)) is not sufficient since<br />

in that case ∂x1(z 2 )|z| 2p−2z does not belong to L1 . It is the reason why we have constructed<br />

bounded solutions to justify (9.3.6) and (9.3.7).<br />

9.4 Existence <strong>of</strong> a global weak solution for L 2 -initilal<br />

data<br />

Theorem 9.4.1 For all z0 ∈ L 2 (Ω), all T > 0, and all f ∈ L 2 (0, T ; L 2 (Ω)), equation (9.3.3)<br />

admits a unique weak solution in C([0, T ]; L 2 (Ω)) ∩ L 2 (0, T ; H 1 0(Ω)) in the sense <strong>of</strong> definition

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!