29.03.2013 Views

The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space

The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space

The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Live Adventures<br />

manifest themselves in the spaces <strong>and</strong> boundaries of the urban environment.<br />

Thus, rather than attempting to produce our observations from a traditionally<br />

“oppositional” viewpoint, our work aims to connect different values <strong>and</strong><br />

ideas so as to encourage a certain reflective skepticism toward individual actions<br />

<strong>and</strong> their collective results. Our work combines these social concerns<br />

with certain formal <strong>and</strong> conceptual art-historical references in order to aestheticize<br />

a “twisted critique” of the sites <strong>and</strong> contexts we engage with.<br />

While our formal concerns fuse with an ideological engagement, we also<br />

hope to retain an element of good humor.<br />

CAMELOT<br />

Camelot was a site-specific installation produced for <strong>City</strong> Limits, a group<br />

show curated by Godfrey Burke <strong>and</strong> organized by Terry Shave, head of fine<br />

art at Staffordshire University, in September 1996. <strong>The</strong> show consisted of an<br />

exhibition in the university galleries <strong>and</strong> several new site-specific commissions<br />

around the city of Stoke-on-Trent. When we visited, we intuitively<br />

decided to work on one of the most neglected public sites.<br />

<strong>The</strong> site in Albion Square is distinct yet typical of those found in<br />

many other cities: a poorly planned intersection of heavy flows of foot <strong>and</strong> vehicle<br />

traffic. Although the site marks the entrance to Hanley town center, it<br />

is defined only by three irregularly shaped patches of trampled grass, flanked<br />

with anti-pedestrian brickwork, <strong>and</strong> cut off by traffic on either side. Rather<br />

than using a public art commission to superficially enhance the site, we decided<br />

to produce something that would engage with the very conception of<br />

“public.” In one sense, our piece—Camelot—was a literal interpretation of the<br />

“city limits” theme, as it aimed to provoke reflection <strong>and</strong> debate on the physical<br />

<strong>and</strong> social boundaries that often determine the patterns of city life.<br />

Camelot used 120 meters of 3-meter-high steel palisade security fencing to<br />

deny people access to these small, neglected fragments of public urban l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

By reinforcing the boundaries of these grass verges with an excessive<br />

display of authority, we raised the status of the l<strong>and</strong> through its enclosure.<br />

In the context of the contemporary debate around security <strong>and</strong> access<br />

within town centers, Camelot explored the political notion of the “tragedy of<br />

the commons”—that is, the tendency of resources not under private ownership<br />

to fall into neglect. While construction work was taking place we encountered<br />

a great deal of very real—at times threatening—anger from local<br />

people passing by or visiting the piece. Through many discussions, it became<br />

apparent that the neglect of this site was held to be symptomatic of a<br />

lack of communication between the electorate <strong>and</strong> their representatives on<br />

the town council.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!