29.03.2013 Views

The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space

The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space

The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> Claremont Road Situation<br />

sage through various ambiences.” 13 This often involved purposeful disorientation<br />

to subvert “knowable” space (by, for example, following the map of<br />

one area of the city while in another) <strong>and</strong> to allow a spontaneous drifting<br />

that focused on bodily <strong>and</strong> psychological encounters, thereby exploring the<br />

richness of human places replete with memory, myth, <strong>and</strong> imaginative possibilities.<br />

But to actually reassert place, to contest the capitalist production<br />

of space, Lefebvre <strong>and</strong> the situationists advocated the self-conscious construction<br />

of new subjective environments—an unfolding of art through<br />

space. This would involve the spatial exploration <strong>and</strong> celebration of the essentially<br />

subjective unalienated areas of life, such as humor, creativity, play,<br />

imagination, street life <strong>and</strong> carnivals, passion, history, spontaneity, <strong>and</strong> bodily<br />

pleasures. <strong>Space</strong> would thus be saturated with Lefebvre’s “new romanticism”;<br />

it would be “appropriated” from capitalism.<br />

Such an appropriation of space through the construction of situations<br />

is precisely what occurred at Claremont Road in 1994, <strong>and</strong> events<br />

there graphically illustrate the space/place dialectic. For had the area not already<br />

been rendered anonymous <strong>and</strong> banal, then the activists would not<br />

have been able to impose themselves upon it so emphatically—place could<br />

not have been so effectively reasserted over space. Certainly the view of the<br />

Department of Transport seemed to be that no one cared about Leyton. Although<br />

it housed many people, no one appeared to “live” there. Building a<br />

motorway through the area should have been conflict-free. But the Department<br />

of Transport made a tactical mistake; as it bought up the houses along<br />

the route, instead of demolishing them immediately, it made them available<br />

as temporary studios through Acme, a charity dedicated to finding space for<br />

artists. <strong>The</strong>se people began, initially without purpose, to practice exactly<br />

what Lefebvre <strong>and</strong> the situationists had been preaching: they explored their<br />

creative potential through their environment. An embryonic sense of place<br />

developed, which provided the seeds of later resistance. <strong>The</strong> authorities presumably<br />

employed West African security guards partly in an attempt to<br />

mitigate against this strategic error. Besides being cheap to hire, these<br />

people were also perceived by the authorities to be culturally distant, literally<br />

dis-placed, <strong>and</strong> therefore were expected to be less sensitive to the unique<br />

ambience being developed.<br />

Claremont Road demonstrated that situationist tactics can be extremely<br />

effective. It exposed the space/place dialectic so thoroughly that no<br />

one needed to be steeped in French cultural theory to recognize these as the<br />

fundamental issues being contested. This shows that Lefebvre <strong>and</strong> Debord,<br />

writing largely before the era of mass car ownership, had remarkably prescient<br />

insight; their arguments have proved valid. But it also reveals something<br />

of a historical oversight, for they did not sufficiently emphasize the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!