29.03.2013 Views

The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space

The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space

The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

For over a century, the headquarters buildings of the Hongkong <strong>and</strong><br />

Shanghai Bank served as prominent symbols of the central business district<br />

of Hong Kong. <strong>The</strong>re were three purpose-designed buildings built<br />

at fifty-year intervals—in 1886, 1935, 1986—each on the same site<br />

fronting the harbor.<br />

As headquarters of the most important financial institution in<br />

Hong Kong, these buildings embedded in their built forms social relations<br />

<strong>and</strong> meanings unique to the colonial setting of Hong Kong at particular<br />

moments in time. To underst<strong>and</strong> what was expressed architecturally, we<br />

must consider what contributed to these forms in the first place; <strong>and</strong> the<br />

power structure of colonialism provides one means of entry into such an investigation.<br />

Although “power” by itself did not contribute directly to built<br />

form, it was the underlying force that acted on physical manifestations as its<br />

impact was channeled through various participants in the building process.<br />

To analyze the power structure of colonialism involves the unfolding of relations<br />

that operated in a hierarchical spatial order: the power structure<br />

within the colony, the power structure between the core <strong>and</strong> the periphery,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the power structure between the empire <strong>and</strong> the world at large. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

relations did not operate independently but reinforced each other. Together<br />

they mapped out the overall mechanism through which colonialism was instituted<br />

<strong>and</strong> sustained.<br />

This chapter looks at the earliest headquarters building of 1886<br />

<strong>and</strong> unravels how class <strong>and</strong> race relations were expressed architecturally, focusing<br />

in particular on the “power structure” within the colony: that is, the<br />

dominance-dependence relationship between the Europeans <strong>and</strong> the Chinese.<br />

It examines first the characteristics of one of the main elements of<br />

the dominant group—the merchant community, whose members were the<br />

clients of the headquarters project <strong>and</strong> the main users of the building—<strong>and</strong><br />

second the relationship between the two cultural groups in terms of the<br />

means of control, both within the Bank <strong>and</strong> in the society as a whole. Finally,<br />

it highlights the context in which this dominance-dependence relationship<br />

was grounded <strong>and</strong> which determined how it was expressed in the<br />

headquarters building.<br />

<strong>The</strong> 1886 headquarters building was commissioned in 1882<br />

when the scheme prepared by Clement Palmer of the architectural firm<br />

Wilson <strong>and</strong> Bird won the public competition launched by the Bank. 1 A<br />

local contractor called “Tai Yick” was used, <strong>and</strong> the building took four<br />

years to complete at a cost of HK$300,000. 2 <strong>The</strong> site was rectangular in<br />

shape, with a frontage of 125 feet <strong>and</strong> a depth of 225 feet, <strong>and</strong> stood on reclaimed<br />

l<strong>and</strong> along the praya (embankment). 3 <strong>The</strong> building consisted of<br />

two separate volumes linked together: that facing the harbor with arched

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!