29.03.2013 Views

The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space

The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space

The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Part I: Filters<br />

86<br />

4<br />

87<br />

Joe Kerr<br />

reconstituted together in the warm nostalgic glow that increasingly colors<br />

all of the past, they offer the tourist an uncritical <strong>and</strong> easily consumed version<br />

of London’s heritage. As with so much else of our own city’s history, the<br />

past has become a seamless text no longer ordered by chronology, in which<br />

real <strong>and</strong> simulated memory cannot easily be differentiated, but which can<br />

be “experienced” <strong>and</strong> consumed equally by all. This devaluing of collective<br />

memory, <strong>and</strong> the reconstruction of London’s fabric as essentially a theme<br />

park of itself, threatens to render our own recent past as the ultimate seductive<br />

spectacle for a passive <strong>and</strong> depoliticized citizenry.<br />

As a recent book has suggested, historians <strong>and</strong> politicians are still<br />

“re-fighting World War II,” <strong>and</strong> as yet there is nothing resembling a definitive<br />

account of that conflict. 28 At the risk of preaching another kind of instrumental<br />

history, we cannot allow the memory of war to become a passive<br />

act. “Lest we forget” must remain an imperative, both because the fight<br />

against fascism is a permanent one <strong>and</strong> because this truly is our history. <strong>The</strong><br />

ease with which memory has been appropriated by the forces of capital, <strong>and</strong><br />

reproduced in its commodified form of nostalgia, not only serves as a barrier<br />

to the past but does equal harm in obscuring the possibilities of the future.<br />

THE FUTURE OF THE PAST<br />

Distance in time, <strong>and</strong> the diminishing of firsth<strong>and</strong> experience, does not<br />

seem to be making the problem of creating an appropriate memorial culture<br />

for the Second World War any simpler. Indeed, in many European cities the<br />

difficulties of publicly rendering this particular period of history in a form<br />

that also satisfies contemporary ideological priorities are currently proving<br />

challenging to solve. For instance, in Dresden the bombed ruins of the<br />

Frauenkirche, which for nearly fifty years were conserved as a memorial to<br />

the city’s destruction, are now undergoing a controversial reconstruction.<br />

Despite the obvious questions that this act raises about remembrance, as<br />

well as considerable reservations among some citizens, its promoters claim<br />

that “re-erecting this great church does not mean a failure to confront our<br />

history.” 29 In Berlin, meanwhile, attempts to construct a vast holocaust<br />

memorial are currently beset by controversy on an international scale.<br />

Rather more optimistically, in the East End of London a campaign<br />

has been gathering force to erect a monument to the 2,193 local civilian casualties<br />

of the Blitz, in what was the most heavily bombed area of any<br />

British city. 30 <strong>The</strong> Civilians Remembered Campaign is particularly interesting<br />

because despite having attracted widespread support from political<br />

leaders <strong>and</strong> royalty, it does appear to have started as a genuinely local, popular<br />

agitation. Furthermore, the battle to claim a particular site overlooking

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!