The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space

The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space

athemita.files.wordpress.com
from athemita.files.wordpress.com More from this publisher
29.03.2013 Views

Part I: Filters 84 4 85 Joe Kerr is actually a careful reconstruction, or even enhancement. Waxwork marines, cardboard evacuees, reproduction newspapers, and the taped noise of bombs and sirens—which could never have been heard in this underground bunker in 1940—are required to orient people, to jog the necessary set of historical references. It is this denial of imagination and interpretation, the predigestion of the past to allow uncritical consumption in the present, that is most worrying about these new urban tableaux. Their meanings are fixed and unassailable, at least in their own space. The ultimate accomplishment of such fragmentary pantheons is their ability to distance the reality of remembered experiences by presenting simulated participation in dramatized historical events, to be enjoyed as if they really were near-perfect re-creations of what actually happened. In the process, all sense of the problematic nature of this wartime experience, of suffering and of conflict, has been censored—a continuation of the careful process that had ensured the destruction of the Lenin Memorial forty years previously. THE “EXPERIENCE” OF WAR London is increasingly represented in spectacles that have no discernible connection with authentic sites or events at all—the total simulation of a nonexistent past. Under railway arches in Waterloo and next to the “Jack the Ripper Experience” can be found the grandiosely titled “Winston Churchill’s Britain at War Theme Museum,” containing the “Blitz Experi- 4.8

Part I: Filters<br />

84<br />

4<br />

85<br />

Joe Kerr<br />

is actually a careful reconstruction, or even enhancement. Waxwork marines,<br />

cardboard evacuees, reproduction newspapers, <strong>and</strong> the taped noise of bombs<br />

<strong>and</strong> sirens—which could never have been heard in this underground bunker<br />

in 1940—are required to orient people, to jog the necessary set of historical<br />

references. It is this denial of imagination <strong>and</strong> interpretation, the predigestion<br />

of the past to allow uncritical consumption in the present, that is most<br />

worrying about these new urban tableaux. <strong>The</strong>ir meanings are fixed <strong>and</strong><br />

unassailable, at least in their own space.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ultimate accomplishment of such fragmentary pantheons is<br />

their ability to distance the reality of remembered experiences by presenting<br />

simulated participation in dramatized historical events, to be enjoyed as<br />

if they really were near-perfect re-creations of what actually happened. In<br />

the process, all sense of the problematic nature of this wartime experience,<br />

of suffering <strong>and</strong> of conflict, has been censored—a continuation of the careful<br />

process that had ensured the destruction of the Lenin Memorial forty<br />

years previously.<br />

THE “EXPERIENCE” OF WAR<br />

London is increasingly represented in spectacles that have no discernible<br />

connection with authentic sites or events at all—the total simulation of a<br />

nonexistent past. Under railway arches in Waterloo <strong>and</strong> next to the “Jack<br />

the Ripper Experience” can be found the gr<strong>and</strong>iosely titled “Winston<br />

Churchill’s Britain at War <strong>The</strong>me Museum,” containing the “Blitz Experi-<br />

4.8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!