29.03.2013 Views

The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space

The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space

The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Double Erasure of Times Square<br />

schemes? Or has a gr<strong>and</strong> mistake been made, <strong>and</strong> has this dysfunction junction<br />

been mauled by disimprovement policies amending its authentic nature<br />

instead of addressing its corruption? Has Times Square/42nd Street<br />

become another “non-place” instantly recognizable from the images that<br />

circulate on television <strong>and</strong> cinema screens, but a space that is never experienced<br />

directly? 1 Is it in danger of extinction or disappearance, reduced to<br />

“any-space-whatever”? Gilles Deleuze claims that “any-space-whatever is<br />

not an abstract universal, in all times, in all places. It is a perfectly singular<br />

space, which has merely lost its homogeneity, that is, the principle of its<br />

metric relations or the connections of its own parts, so that the linkages can<br />

be made in an infinite number of ways. It is a space of virtual conjunction,<br />

grasped as pure locus of the possible.” 2 Certainly, Times Square/42nd Street<br />

appears to be a postmodern any-space-whatever—a heterotopic space juxtaposing<br />

in a single real place several types of spaces. This open-ended disjunctive<br />

set of sites coexists simultaneously as a retro-theater district, a<br />

media center, a Disneyl<strong>and</strong>, a suburban-style shopping mall, an advertising<br />

zone, a corporate office park, a movie but also a song, a novel, a play, a street,<br />

<strong>and</strong> a way of life—a place where prostitutes, pimps, hucksters, or teenagers<br />

rub shoulders with out-of-town conventioneers, theater audiences, corporate<br />

executive secretaries, tourists, <strong>and</strong> families. Can it also be a center for<br />

the visual arts, a place of emerging electronic industries, a truly plugged-in<br />

space connected to the rest of the world?<br />

Even the “Great White Way,” the razzle-dazzle electronic wizardry<br />

of great neon signs that have turned the night lights of Time Square into a<br />

midtown Coney Isl<strong>and</strong> since the mid-1920s, has been tampered with by requiring<br />

that neon signage now adorn every new structure. Lutses have been<br />

turned loose in the square—a 1987 ordinance m<strong>and</strong>ates the amount of illuminated<br />

signage <strong>and</strong> the degree of brilliance that new buildings must carry.<br />

<strong>The</strong> first luts appeared on the giant juke box exterior of the Holiday Inn<br />

Crowned Plaza Hotel at Broadway <strong>and</strong> 48th street in 1989. <strong>The</strong> city wants<br />

these new signs to be as flashy as possible, <strong>and</strong> advertising is clearly allowed,<br />

hoping to cover over the fact that Times Square has become a dull <strong>and</strong> dark<br />

canyon of overlarge skyscraper office towers, the unintended result of zoning<br />

bonuses that operated in the territory around the square between 1982<br />

<strong>and</strong> 1987.<br />

Artkraft Strauss Sign Corporation has kept the competitive glow of<br />

Times Square alive since the first animated ball dropped in 1908. It has been<br />

responsible for the famous Camel ad that belched rings of smoke into the<br />

square, the moving-headline “zipper” around the Times Square Tower created<br />

in 1928, <strong>and</strong> even the Fuji Film panel on 43rd Street. Artkraft has put<br />

up about 99 percent of the signage in the square—more than 200 miles of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!