29.03.2013 Views

The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space

The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space

The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Joe Kerr:<br />

This discussion is accompanying a chapter from your book A Journey<br />

Through Ruins, 1 because its distinct evocation of the city has had a strong influence<br />

on our own practice. So could I ask you to explain something of the<br />

way you researched <strong>and</strong> wrote the book?<br />

Patrick Wright:<br />

A Journey Through Ruins is an episodic book in the sense that it accumulates<br />

through bits of history, territory, <strong>and</strong> events. That’s the polite way of putting<br />

it. It was written at the end of the 1980s, a time when the whole city was being<br />

shaken by a triumphalist Thatcherism, <strong>and</strong> when the London of the postwar<br />

settlement really was in its last days. I didn’t want to do a historical<br />

overview of fifty years of social policy in the East End of London <strong>and</strong> I wanted<br />

place to be fundamental <strong>and</strong> not just as a setting, picturesque or otherwise.<br />

I was living around the corner from Dalston Lane, a hard-pressed street that<br />

was often choked with cars. I walked along it thous<strong>and</strong>s of times before realizing<br />

that this road, which normally one would see only in the perspective<br />

of urban deprivation, was actually very interesting <strong>and</strong> serviceable too. It has<br />

never been a gr<strong>and</strong> street—its nineteenth-century buildings are undistinguished<br />

as well as fallen—but I realized that I could use a three- or fourhundred-yard<br />

stretch of it as a general metaphor. I was impressed by the<br />

extent to which, within a couple of miles of the <strong>City</strong> of London, you could<br />

have a place as battered <strong>and</strong> contrary as Dalston Lane, a street that defied<br />

belief by its mere survival.<br />

<strong>The</strong> 1980s was a decade of “design,” when retailing was going to<br />

be the answer to all social problems, while urban planning gave way to the<br />

market <strong>and</strong> the Dockl<strong>and</strong>s-style enterprise zone. <strong>The</strong> characteristic symbol<br />

of municipal intervention was undergoing miniaturization—from the tower<br />

block of the early seventies to the litter bin, street-cleansing machine, or heritage<br />

bollard. And the urban texture was diminished too: stripped of memory<br />

<strong>and</strong> rendered comparatively uniform by a pseudo-ecological form of “concrete<br />

managerialism” which, as we were finding out, can turn any place into<br />

its own kind of “non-place.” And in the midst of that you had this stretch of<br />

Dalston Lane that was chaotically resistant, a curiously posthumous street<br />

that had been scheduled for demolition for nearly fifty years, <strong>and</strong> which had<br />

certainly never been visited by “design.” Only a shortage of funds had<br />

stopped the Greater London Council (GLC) putting roads through several<br />

decades previously, <strong>and</strong> when I started writing the government was busy<br />

planning to bulldoze it again. So here was this disheveled street where the<br />

raw ends were exposed: it was the underside of all the transformation that<br />

was going on. I was trying to show another form of urban texture, the stuff

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!