Ancient Scottish ballads, recovered from tradition, and never before ...

Ancient Scottish ballads, recovered from tradition, and never before ... Ancient Scottish ballads, recovered from tradition, and never before ...

29.03.2013 Views

108 of Royalty; yet " Sometimes James Marquis of Mon- trose sided with the Covenanters in Scotland, and very forwardly bestowed his unhappily happy endeavours in their behoof. They pretended to nothing then, less than the preservation of religion, the honour and dig- nity of the king, the laws of the land, and the freedom of that ancient realm, so happily, so valiantly defended in the time of yore, from such powerful enemies as the Romans, Saxons, Danes, Normans, by the sweat and blood, with the lives and estates, of their ancestors. But, at last, in the year 1639, Montrose found out that these fair tales were coyn'd of purpose to steal the hearts of the silly and superstitious multitude, and to alienate them from the king, as an enemy to religion and liberty. For the Covenanters did not dissemble to him, but spoke out, that Scotland had been too long governed by kings ; nor could it ever be well with them as long as one Stewart (that's the sirname of the king's family in Scotland) was alive: and in the extir- pation of them, they were first to strike at the head; so that Montrose easily perceived the king's majesty and person was levelled at. Therefore, vehemently detesting so horrible a crime, he resolved to desert the conspirators' side, to frustrate their counsels, to im- poverish their store, to weaken their strength, and with all his might to preserve his majesty and his authority entire and inviolate."— Wishearfs Memoirs of Mon- trose. It would appear that it was during the period of his unfortunate attachment to the Covenanters, that the house of Airly was plundered; for Montrose did not desert that party till 1641.

LORD DONALD. This ballad seems to be of an ancient cast: one version of it, under the title of Lord Randal, has been published in the Border Minstrelsy, vol. 2, p. 291. This copy, which was procured in the north, differs in many respects from that of Lord Randal, and appears to be more com- plete in its detail. Is the Editor of the Border Minstrelsy seri- ous when he says that this ballad, because his version bore the title of Lord Randal, " may have originally regarded the death of Thomas Randolph or Randal, Earl of Murray, nephew to Robert Bruce, and governor of Scotland;" whose death is attributed by our historians to poison, said to have been administered to him by a friar, at the instigation of Edward III. ?

108<br />

of Royalty; yet " Sometimes James Marquis of Mon-<br />

trose sided with the Covenanters in Scotl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> very<br />

forwardly bestowed his unhappily happy endeavours in<br />

their behoof. They pretended to nothing then, less<br />

than the preservation of religion, the honour <strong>and</strong> dig-<br />

nity of the king, the laws of the l<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> the freedom<br />

of that ancient realm, so happily, so valiantly defended<br />

in the time of yore, <strong>from</strong> such powerful enemies as the<br />

Romans, Saxons, Danes, Normans, by the sweat <strong>and</strong><br />

blood, with the lives <strong>and</strong> estates, of their ancestors.<br />

But, at last, in the year 1639, Montrose found out that<br />

these fair tales were coyn'd of purpose to steal the<br />

hearts of the silly <strong>and</strong> superstitious multitude, <strong>and</strong> to<br />

alienate them <strong>from</strong> the king, as an enemy to religion<br />

<strong>and</strong> liberty. For the Covenanters did not dissemble<br />

to him, but spoke out, that Scotl<strong>and</strong> had been too<br />

long governed by kings ; nor could it ever be well with<br />

them as long as one Stewart (that's the sirname of the<br />

king's family in Scotl<strong>and</strong>) was alive: <strong>and</strong> in the extir-<br />

pation of them, they were first to strike at the head;<br />

so that Montrose easily perceived the king's majesty<br />

<strong>and</strong> person was levelled at. Therefore, vehemently<br />

detesting so horrible a crime, he resolved to desert the<br />

conspirators' side, to frustrate their counsels, to im-<br />

poverish their store, to weaken their strength, <strong>and</strong> with<br />

all his might to preserve his majesty <strong>and</strong> his authority<br />

entire <strong>and</strong> inviolate."— Wishearfs Memoirs of Mon-<br />

trose. It would appear that it was during the period<br />

of his unfortunate attachment to the Covenanters, that<br />

the house of Airly was plundered; for Montrose did<br />

not desert that party till 1641.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!